Dealt vs. Contributed

[NNNNOOOOONAN]

Ok, I'm not sure exactly how to pose this, but basically:

Suppose a player has a 15% VPIP. Site A offers 40% rakeback using the contributed method. Site B offers 25% rakeback using the dealt method.

Which of the two sites would be better for the player, ignoring factors like game selection among others?

Also, how would the numbers have to be adjusted to make one site a better choice for a player with a VPIP> 15% and for a player with a VPIP <15%?

I hope his question makes sense. If any of you math guys feel like figuring this out, but I explained it too awkwardly, please let me know.

x-posted in like 3 places because no one has ever answered.

[MuckinWinners]

I'll take a stab at this.

My estimate is the 30% Dealt RB is equivalent to roughly 62% Contributed RB. This is just calculating straight RB, and ASSUMING that NO other factors are present such as MGR deductions affecting RB.

[AAAA]

15% vpip players want to play at tilt or ub. it is going to be at least double for the dealt cards if you are that tight.

[Mr. Orange]

[ QUOTE ]
I'll take a stab at this.

My estimate is the 30% Dealt RB is equivalent to roughly 62% Contributed RB. This is just calculating straight RB, and ASSUMING that NO other factors are present such as MGR deductions affecting RB.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would agree with that estimate.

[NNNNOOOOONAN]

wow, i just was looking through my posts for this one to see if anyone actually replied. i can't believe someone figured this out.

ty