|
|
#32
11-15-2007, 12:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A hand against Swami...
[ QUOTE ]
Ok- then why not jam the flop? [/ QUOTE ] To get him to raise my bet on the turn. If I would have kept jamming the flop, he may have read me for a set and just called the turn, instead of raising the turn like he did. 
|
|
#33
11-15-2007, 02:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A hand against Swami...
I don't understand how just calling the flop then leading the turn is supposed to get more bets on average than jamming the flop and leading the turn. Is he really giving you a chance to bet/threebet enough to give up that extra equity?
From the description of this guy, it doesn't sound likely at all. I know it worked out this time, but it sounds like this was an outlier.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
