|
|
#221
10-16-2007, 05:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Absolute Poker Scandal: An Inside Job
Dunno if anyone hit this yet, but the Domain Discreet thing that some were confused about earlier, as I understand it is a very very common service. I own a few domains myself and used a similar service so that my name + address didn't come up in the WHOIS search. In the US if you "own" a domain you are legally required to put your correct contact info up there on the domain registration for everyone to see-- so there are other companies like DD who you can pay $30/yr to "take ownership" of the domain and put their corporation's contact info in your place, protecting your ID from spammers and the like.
|
|
#222
10-16-2007, 05:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Absolute Poker Scandal: An Inside Job
[ QUOTE ]
Can we be sure he is the only one USING that IP? [/ QUOTE ] No, we can't. It could be anyone else with access to his home cable modem. |
|
#223
10-16-2007, 05:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Absolute Poker Scandal: An Inside Job
[ QUOTE ]
quoting this for hilarity once you look up [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, these monster threads have like 50 new replies by the time you've read everything and then decide to respond. |
|
#226
10-16-2007, 05:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Absolute Poker Scandal: An Inside Job
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Can we be sure he is the only one USING that IP? [/ QUOTE ] No, we can't. It could be anyone else with access to his home cable modem. [/ QUOTE ] Do you know that it's his home modem for sure? I know that it is residential, but I don't know for sure it's actually his. It seems like we've only confirmed that it is: a) residential (someone told me this) and b) something he used (you confirmed this in your earlier post) I think it would be his home, but don't know for sure. |
|
#227
10-16-2007, 05:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Absolute Poker Scandal: An Inside Job
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Where is the reasoning for the CEO to risk everything for a million or so $? [/ QUOTE ]Social experiment obv. [/ QUOTE ] hi ancaps, I hope you guys are taking notes |
|
#228
10-16-2007, 05:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Absolute Poker Scandal: An Inside Job
Why didn't Scott Tom try to make it a bit less obvious when he was playing on his superaccount?
He is a poker player IRL so he should have known this stuff would have been noticed. |
|
#229
10-16-2007, 05:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Absolute Poker Scandal: An Inside Job
[ QUOTE ]
lol. www.rivieraltd.com is no longer accessible. [/ QUOTE ] http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.rivieraltd.com/ shows no pages found for rivieraltd.com. |
|
#230
10-16-2007, 05:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Absolute Poker Scandal: An Inside Job
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Can we be sure he is the only one USING that IP? [/ QUOTE ] No, we can't. It could be anyone else with access to his home cable modem. [/ QUOTE ] Do you know that it's his home modem for sure? I know that it is residential, but I don't know for sure it's actually his. It seems like we've only confirmed that it is: a) residential (someone told me this) and b) something he used (you confirmed this in your earlier post) I think it would be his home, but don't know for sure. [/ QUOTE ] fair point. could be any of his friends that are coincidentally named Scott and/or using his account, I guess? |
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
