#1
|
|||
|
|||
A question to the 45-man turbo regulars
Regarding variance.
I've played about 400 games at the $55 level and have an ROI of about 30, but the variance has been a little extreme. In my 400 game sample I've had 4 separate out of the money streaks of 20+ and three different times I've been stuck 15 buy-ins and come back to book a 15 buyin win during the course of no more than 80 games. To anyone with a huge sample in these, is this sort of variance common? If it is I'm going to stock up on pepto bismal, because if a 20-buyin streak happens every 100 games than a 50+ downswing is only a matter of time. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question to the 45-man turbo regulars
Sherman did the fun math. Would take 1500 games to have a 95% accuracy on variance, I believe he said.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question to the 45-man turbo regulars
This ROI simulator might be able to show you what you're looking for. Though I haven't played with it enough to be sure.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question to the 45-man turbo regulars
[ QUOTE ]
Sherman did the fun math. Would take 1500 games to have a 95% accuracy on variance, I believe he said. [/ QUOTE ] Are you sure you don't mean ROI instead of variance? In any case I realize my sample is really small, which is why I'm looking to expand it by finding the experiences of others. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question to the 45-man turbo regulars
id be very suprised if there were many ppl over 400 of those played they are pretty new
out of curiosity what is ure stars name iv prolly played a copule with u |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A question to the 45-man turbo regulars
Yes I mean ROI :P.
I play lower limits, but the math should be about the same since it only incorporates field size and variance. |
|
|