Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-07-2007, 04:10 AM
Hattifnatt Hattifnatt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: FT
Posts: 8,202
Default Pocket pairs

In a 6-handed 2/4 - 5/10 game. Do you "always" play (call or reraise) all PPs from all positions for a single raise (standard raise about 3-6bb or possibly more with limpers) if effective stacks are 100bb+?

If not, can you give an example or two of when you dump the small ones.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-07-2007, 04:16 AM
Overfloater Overfloater is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 893
Default Re: Pocket pairs

I muck JJ. cant stand dem hooks
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-07-2007, 04:20 AM
jkkkk jkkkk is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: being run over
Posts: 4,454
Default Re: Pocket pairs

solid tag opens UTG/HJ for 4x, I'm folding low pp's f/ SB unless BB is a calling station.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-07-2007, 04:30 AM
Rotterdaum Rotterdaum is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: TorontoCanada
Posts: 1,315
Default Re: Pocket pairs

good example. i'd expand it, and I think it's more applicable to, a good LAG raising any position and you have a PP smaller than like 77 in SB ... not a great spot
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-07-2007, 04:31 AM
feesjah feesjah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: yes please
Posts: 715
Default Re: Pocket pairs

play them all ? :$
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-07-2007, 08:05 AM
stigmata stigmata is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 4,817
Default Re: Pocket pairs

If villain is very good, and your heads-up OOP, then they are probably marginally unprofitable.

But I still call [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-07-2007, 08:16 AM
zio_slim zio_slim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Milano, Italy
Posts: 161
Default Re: Pocket pairs

always reraise ducks ftw
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:37 AM
illuminati illuminati is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Cheltenham.
Posts: 2,247
Default Re: Pocket pairs

I think pairs <77 are great raising/reraising hands from the blinds as they play so easily (usually) post flop and mask the times you have a big hand. Sets in unraised pots have the ghey.

I'd muck 22-66 from an UTG raiser who plays well post flop usually, but in reality I rarely do.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:43 AM
Hattifnatt Hattifnatt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: FT
Posts: 8,202
Default Re: Pocket pairs

[ QUOTE ]
I think pairs <77 are great raising/reraising hands from the blinds as they play so easily (usually) post flop and mask the times you have a big hand. Sets in unraised pots have the ghey.

[/ QUOTE ]
Single raised pot <> Unraised pot, we are not talking about limping obv.

I am actually of the direct opposite opinion, that low pairs are not good hands to 3-bet with from the blinds in general and are much more inclined doing it with hands like AT, KQ and such if someone opens from CO or button.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-07-2007, 09:45 AM
ogdundar ogdundar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 470
Default Re: Pocket pairs

I think this should be the theme of an essay, this topic is definitely not discussed enough. There is so much more to playing these pairs besides set odds, which often is very overrated.

I am not good enough to write it, but someone else should really do it [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Maybe next months internet magasize?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.