|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Are you aware of the Internet Gambling Prohibition Act? | |||
| Yes |
   
|
37 | 94.87% |
| No |
  
|
2 | 5.13% |
| Voters: 39. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#2
11-29-2007, 03:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: You want to go pro?
Bump.
Funniest thing i've seen on a poker table in forever. I almost had to sit out a lap i was laughing so hard Dealt to CLEVERBEAVER [6h Jd] KLONMIKE - Folds POKER111KIC - Calls $3 TREEHORN - Folds WALKTOWAR - Folds CLEVERBEAVER - Calls $1 NEMORAILBIRD - Raises $3 to $6 POKER111KIC - Calls $3 CLEVERBEAVER - Folds *** FLOP *** [Qd 7d Qc] NEMORAILBIRD - Bets $3 POKER111KIC - Calls $3 *** TURN *** [Qd 7d Qc] [Qh] NEMORAILBIRD - Checks POKER111KIC - Bets $6 NEMORAILBIRD - Raises $12 to $12 POKER111KIC - Calls $6 *** RIVER *** [Qd 7d Qc Qh] [Qs] NEMORAILBIRD - Bets $6 POKER111KIC - Raises $12 to $12 NEMORAILBIRD - Raises $12 to $18 POKER111KIC - Calls $6 *** SHOW DOWN *** NEMORAILBIRD - Shows [Ac Ah] (Four of a kind, queens) POKER111KIC - Mucks Just the river play hand me chuckle at first. Then Nemo, the winner, expressed his confusion after the hand, but not at what you'd think. He was confused why it wasnt a chop since they both had quad Q's and told the guy he should email support and complain. Quick changes of notes. I had thought he was a decent regular 
|
|
#3
11-29-2007, 05:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: You want to go pro?
i'd say the same type of crap
|
|
#4
11-29-2007, 05:15 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: You want to go pro?
Any thoughts on Heartpunch, Weallpoker, and Tarcards?
Weallpoker is horrid IMO, but I see him playing up to 50/100 so wtf? Tarcards is an enigma. I never know what to think of this guy. Heartpunch, I just see them on a lot.
|
|
#5
11-29-2007, 12:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: You want to go pro?
Heartpunch I think is better than average. Good enough to not want to sit with if I have a choice, but not good enough to make me think about avoiding.
Tarcards is your standard hyper-LAG. Free money when he runs bad, make you wan to break things when you run bad. Pretty close to unbluffable. I cant decide if he's good or not but he's obvicouly a winning player. As a standard rule I avoid players who buy in for super stacks on mutliple tables. I avoid him because I like to be the spaz at the table. Weallpoker, I think the same as you do, but saw him playing himstakes the other day and did a double take. I decided that the next time I see him I'd have to re-eval because he might just be so good he looks bad. Guess not. BBJ winner maybe?
|
|
#6
11-29-2007, 02:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: You want to go pro?
[ QUOTE ]
Tarcards is your standard hyper-LAG. Free money when he runs bad, make you wan to break things when you run bad. Pretty close to unbluffable. I cant decide if he's good or not but he's obvicouly a winning player. As a standard rule I avoid players who buy in for super stacks on mutliple tables. I avoid him because I like to be the spaz at the table. [/ QUOTE ] Random tarcards observation: he folds all the time in 3-way pots. I don't think I've ever seen him fold HU.
|
|
#7
11-29-2007, 03:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: You want to go pro?
Heartpunch....lol. She doesn't like me. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
Tarcards made me want to shoot myself in the head last night...he ran sick hot. Alway had it or always got there. Weallpoker isn't too good IMO...but not incredibly terrible. Maybe he's just run bad at my tables.
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
