|
|
#11
09-20-2007, 08:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think I watched the same thing. The exact question was: Which is more likely, a 0-16 team or 16-0 team? A fairly legit filler question. [/ QUOTE ] That was the 2nd time they brought it up in the show. The first time started with a reporter asking Belichick if they could go 16-0 to which he obviously said they were only concerned with Buffalo right now. [/ QUOTE ] He should have just said, "Of course we can go 16-0." Just to see if he can be more hated than he is right now. 
|
|
#13
09-20-2007, 11:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
I think I watched the same thing. The exact question was: Which is more likely, a 0-16 team or 16-0 team? A fairly legit filler question. [/ QUOTE ] The Giants and the Pats are working on answering the question.
|
|
#14
09-20-2007, 11:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated NE
[ QUOTE ]
The season is 2 weeks old and ESPN just led off NFL by asking if the Pats can go undefeated. Even for ESPN, this is astonishingly absurd. [/ QUOTE ] Isn't this more along the lines of maintaining their standards? Since when has ESPN raised the bar from the gutter they've been in? b
|
|
#15
09-20-2007, 11:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
The first time started with a reporter asking Belichick if they could go 16-0 [/ QUOTE ] and people wonder why Barry Bonds is a dick to the media jesus most sportswriters have a 100stupid to 1legit question ratio
|
|
#16
09-20-2007, 11:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
I really don't understand why anyone other than a 12 year old kid would watch ESPN other than the actual games broadcasted on the station.
|
|
#17
09-20-2007, 11:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] The first time started with a reporter asking Belichick if they could go 16-0 [/ QUOTE ] and people wonder why Barry Bonds is a dick to the media jesus most sportswriters have a 100stupid to 1legit question ratio [/ QUOTE ] Barry Bonds is a dick in general and it has nothing to do with the media.
|
|
#18
09-20-2007, 11:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think I watched the same thing. The exact question was: Which is more likely, a 0-16 team or 16-0 team? A fairly legit filler question. [/ QUOTE ] The Giants and the Pats are working on answering the question. [/ QUOTE ] Do the Falcons get a game against a high school team?
|
|
#19
09-21-2007, 12:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] The first time started with a reporter asking Belichick if they could go 16-0 [/ QUOTE ] and people wonder why Barry Bonds is a dick to the media jesus most sportswriters have a 100stupid to 1legit question ratio [/ QUOTE ] Barry Bonds is a dick in general and it has nothing to do with the media. [/ QUOTE ] curious, rough estimate on the number of minutes you have spent talking to Barry Bonds or examples of dickish things he has done to you, or someone you know well
|
|
#20
09-21-2007, 12:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
I heard CNN already announced the outcome of the 2008 election.
And by CNN, I of course mean Diebold...
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
