|
|
|
|
#1
09-20-2007, 04:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated NE
The season is 2 weeks old and ESPN just led off NFL by asking if the Pats can go undefeated. Even for ESPN, this is astonishingly absurd.
|
|
#2
09-20-2007, 04:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
Wow...I guess at least if they are 13-0 or something later on, they can come back and say, "we told you during week 2 that this Patriots team had the potential to go undefeated."
This is retarded to talk about until at least week 10.
|
|
#3
09-22-2007, 02:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
Wow...I guess at least if they are 13-0 or something later on, they can come back and say, "we told you during week 2 that this Patriots team had the potential to go undefeated."\ This is retarded to talk about until at least week 10. [/ QUOTE ] I think if they soundly win their first 9 games it wouldn't be retarded to talk about.
|
|
#5
09-20-2007, 04:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
what else are they gonna talk about theyre prob like 15-1 at this point (maybe im way off?) so its something to think about [/ QUOTE ] do you think they are like 82.5% to win each game? that's roughly what their average game win% would need to be to be 15/1 against
|
|
#6
09-20-2007, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
I think I watched the same thing. The exact question was: Which is more likely, a 0-16 team or 16-0 team? A fairly legit filler question.
|
|
#7
09-20-2007, 08:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
I think I watched the same thing. The exact question was: Which is more likely, a 0-16 team or 16-0 team? A fairly legit filler question. [/ QUOTE ] That was the 2nd time they brought it up in the show. The first time started with a reporter asking Belichick if they could go 16-0 to which he obviously said they were only concerned with Buffalo right now.
|
|
#8
09-20-2007, 08:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think I watched the same thing. The exact question was: Which is more likely, a 0-16 team or 16-0 team? A fairly legit filler question. [/ QUOTE ] That was the 2nd time they brought it up in the show. The first time started with a reporter asking Belichick if they could go 16-0 to which he obviously said they were only concerned with Buffalo right now. [/ QUOTE ] He should have just said, "Of course we can go 16-0." Just to see if he can be more hated than he is right now.
|
|
#9
09-20-2007, 11:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
The first time started with a reporter asking Belichick if they could go 16-0 [/ QUOTE ] and people wonder why Barry Bonds is a dick to the media jesus most sportswriters have a 100stupid to 1legit question ratio
|
|
#10
09-20-2007, 11:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ESPN sets new standard for premature analysis. Talk of undefeated
[ QUOTE ]
I think I watched the same thing. The exact question was: Which is more likely, a 0-16 team or 16-0 team? A fairly legit filler question. [/ QUOTE ] The Giants and the Pats are working on answering the question.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
