Who would you like to see permabanned?

[Ryan Beal]

The lower number should be correct. It's likely most of that disparity comes from deleted users.

[Mat Sklansky]

that's a huge gap, isn't it? we deleted over 20,000 users?

[Ryan Beal]

... possibly? The history and user numbers involved go so far back I would only be guessing. Chuck may have a better idea of why it's such a big margin from his experience. The user number assigned should always be significantly higher than the real number at this point, though.

Old vB import data from around the start of May reads 83,411. Oh, and we will get to save our most online record. I found the right stuff to run for that.

[ajmargarine]

[ QUOTE ]
now that bluffthis is gone

[/ QUOTE ]

Wait, what? wadimiss?

[durron597]

[ QUOTE ]
lol @ degen.

[/ QUOTE ]

[durron597]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
now that bluffthis is gone

[/ QUOTE ]

Wait, what? wadimiss?

[/ QUOTE ]

edit: did the pokerbob thing actually go down?

[diebitter]

Maybe a lot of people registered and didn't validate? or there's a shedload of gimmicks that only posted like once?

[MEbenhoe]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
now that bluffthis is gone

[/ QUOTE ]

Wait, what? wadimiss?

[/ QUOTE ]

edit: did the pokerbob thing actually go down?

[/ QUOTE ]

not 100% sure, but talked to pokerbob this weekend and he made it seem as though it did.

[citanul]

1) yes, there's a shitton of deleted users
2) lol @ degen
3) more to come later.

[*TT*]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
now that bluffthis is gone

[/ QUOTE ]

Wait, what? wadimiss?

[/ QUOTE ]

edit: did the pokerbob thing actually go down?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yep. They are still playing chicken. Bob is taking this all lightheartedly and I would guess so is BluffThis! Once one of them blinks the other will come back.

Irony: Bob just won the Canterbury Classic limit event heads up vs Schneids. That would have made for some fantastic threads here, oh well.