#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very simple fundamentals
well against a good person who can read these situations then, I like b3b instead of c/r because of stack sizing.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very simple fundamentals
Pot is 225 and we have 500 left and you want to bet/3b?
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very simple fundamentals
oh what I thought we had eff stacks 1k.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very simple fundamentals
I have 2200 and he has 600. It's the other guys who have 1200, not villain in this hand.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very simple fundamentals
Ya I like c/ring, vs make-m00000ves players. otherwise b/f is what i'd do
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very simple fundamentals
am i the only one who checks here then probably calls?
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very simple fundamentals
[ QUOTE ]
am i the only one who checks here then probably calls? [/ QUOTE ] No. Does this depend on having Js? Would you c/c red jacks here, too? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very simple fundamentals
no i would probably bet-fold them
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very simple fundamentals
[ QUOTE ]
I don't want another spade [/ QUOTE ] He rarely has a lone [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] higher than a J here without already having us beat. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Very simple fundamentals
or maybe check fold them depending on the guy
|
|
|