#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: always those overpairs...
...snip...
As played: do you call the river? At that point I was backt to reading him for a set. ...snip... Why are you reading him for a set? A set is going bet the turn in order to get he rest of your stack in on the river. A raggy 2 pair is going to bet the turn as well. I think you are ahead here more often than you are behind. I think it is a pretty easy call on the river. You have really underrepresented your hand. I think you see AJ, KJ, QJ, TT here a lot. He may have nothing or a middle pair. He raised a flop that was likely to miss an Ax or Kx hand. He checked the turn when you backed down. He is either value betting a marginal hand or bluffing a missed hand as often or more often than he has a set. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL50: always those overpairs...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] corsakh: Being OOP and the flop not coordinated its an easy push for me. [/ QUOTE ]I don't understand this. We would be more willing to push if the flop were somewhat coordinated, right? Isn't the dry flop calling for some caution? [/ QUOTE ]I'm not getting this either, could somebody explain? |
|
|