WCOOP threads??? - Page 5

gobbomom · #41 10-19-2007, 11:09 AM

[ QUOTE ]
It could also have been lawyers representing TheV0id in a suit against PokerStars. I would think that a bit less likely than Stars. Then again, I'm pretty disappointed 2p2 would take such threads down regardless of who requested it.

[/ QUOTE ]

if the Void's lawyers are suing Stars> Stars can make no statements> 2+2 has to remove threads in which Stars made statements.

Georgia Avenue · #42 10-19-2007, 11:18 AM

why is gobbomom like the Don King of 2+2?

suspicious if you ask me.

THEOSU · #43 10-19-2007, 11:25 AM

ga,

fwiw gobbomom is more like the jesse jackson of 2+2 imo.

gobbomom · #44 10-19-2007, 11:30 AM

idk, I think maybe I prefer Al Sharpton over those 2.

gobbomom · #45 10-19-2007, 12:50 PM

lol at my new avatar. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] some funny, funny guys around here.

PopeInRome · #46 10-19-2007, 01:04 PM

steve1127 · #47 10-19-2007, 02:41 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It could also have been lawyers representing TheV0id in a suit against PokerStars. I would think that a bit less likely than Stars. Then again, I'm pretty disappointed 2p2 would take such threads down regardless of who requested it.

[/ QUOTE ]

if the Void's lawyers are suing Stars> Stars can make no statements> 2+2 has to remove threads in which Stars made statements.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, I don't get the last part. 2+2 is a public forum, how can it be made to remove threads just because somebody doesn't want what they wrote to be public anymore? If they had just deleted PS posts, that would make sense, but to delete everybody else's posts seems like an overreaction, no?

[Phill] · #48 10-19-2007, 03:59 PM

The million dollar question (litterally) is can AP send a legalese letter to 2+2 now and you guys have to pull the info from public view?

How much is that info worth to AP you reckon? [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] J/K

gobbomom · #49 10-19-2007, 05:10 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
It could also have been lawyers representing TheV0id in a suit against PokerStars. I would think that a bit less likely than Stars. Then again, I'm pretty disappointed 2p2 would take such threads down regardless of who requested it.

[/ QUOTE ]

if the Void's lawyers are suing Stars> Stars can make no statements> 2+2 has to remove threads in which Stars made statements.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, I don't get the last part. 2+2 is a public forum, how can it be made to remove threads just because somebody doesn't want what they wrote to be public anymore? If they had just deleted PS posts, that would make sense, but to delete everybody else's posts seems like an overreaction, no?

[/ QUOTE ]

well, I'm just speculating, obv., see my avatar. Anyway, nothing's deleted, just moved into the "secured area".

Troll_Inc · #50 10-19-2007, 09:14 PM

LOL at this whole thing.

I don't know exactly what someone wants to let the cat back into the bag about, but...

Once you have a press release or you put stuff up on the web, i.e. if it "gets out there"...you can't just "take it back"....

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&s...+twoplustwo.com

Just select "cache" and you can pretty much read the whole thread.