Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-04-2007, 02:28 AM
jah7_fsu1 jah7_fsu1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,598
Default Re: Would this make the NBA about 5,546 times better to watch?

[ QUOTE ]
Well, I'm so old-school that I still think college hoops would be better without the shot-clock.
No, I'm not kidding.

[/ QUOTE ]

Surely you are though....I mean you'd WANT to watch outmatched teams try and hold the ball all half?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-04-2007, 04:49 AM
RickAstleyFan RickAstleyFan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 1,031
Default Re: Would this make the NBA about 5,546 times better to watch?

How about not allowing a team to call a timeout immediately after the other team called one then?

Example, the Pistons call one with 32 seconds left, two minute commercial. Then they line up to toss the ball in, and the Bucks call one to set up their defense. Another two minutes, then the guy can't inbound the ball safely, so he calls another 20 second timeout.

That should not be allowed...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-04-2007, 10:51 AM
oe39 oe39 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 511
Default Re: Would this make the NBA about 5,546 times better to watch?

this is your problem with the nba?

not that the refs, who in most instances decide the outcome of the games, don't have any video review and are in some cases betting on the results?
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-04-2007, 11:07 AM
jogsxyz jogsxyz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,167
Default Re: Would this make the NBA about 5,546 times better to watch?

[ QUOTE ]
Well, I'm so old-school that I still think college hoops would be better without the shot-clock.
No, I'm not kidding.

[/ QUOTE ]

There were games where both sides scored less than 20 points before the shot-clock. Teams would just hold the ball against Wilt Chamberlain. Boring.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-04-2007, 11:59 AM
infinitejester infinitejester is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: hitchhiking to rhome
Posts: 5
Default Re: Would this make the NBA about 5,546 times better to watch?

[ QUOTE ]
My father always says the NBA was way better without the 3 point line.

[/ QUOTE ]

I believe this is huge factor in the less aesthetic brand of basketball prevalent today, not only in the NBA but college and high school as well. There is always talk about how players are less fundamentally sound than in the "old days" and I think the three point line contributed more to this than the reasons usually discussed, and offenses geared to take advantage of the three are often less aethetically pleasing as well.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-04-2007, 02:50 PM
RickAstleyFan RickAstleyFan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 1,031
Default Re: Would this make the NBA about 5,546 times better to watch?

How about adding a "five-pointer" from anywhere in the circle at midcourt.

Then, if a team was down by four with three seconds left, they would have to defend the MIDDLE of the court, then defend against a five-point shot.

All MTV style...
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-04-2007, 02:55 PM
Butcho22 Butcho22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Thinking about Tiger, ldo
Posts: 2,119
Default Re: Would this make the NBA about 5,546 times better to watch?

rock n jock ftw
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-04-2007, 03:18 PM
Teh1337zor Teh1337zor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: RIP Sean Taylor
Posts: 6,813
Default Re: Would this make the NBA about 5,546 times better to watch?

timeouts set up awesome end of the game plays
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-04-2007, 03:19 PM
Arnold_O Arnold_O is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 644
Default Re: Would this make the NBA about 5,546 times better to watch?

[ QUOTE ]
OK, reading some column last week and it mentioned the idea of eliminating timeouts during the final three minutes of an NBA game.

Ever watched an old NBA game, they go BACK AND FORTH with awesome intensity.

There is no timeout after timeout after 20 second timeout.

I would tweak it and allow a team to call one timeout from 3:00 to 1:00 remaining, and a second with less than a minute left.


Would this work? Would this increase ratings and produce millions of extra dollars of revenue?

Curious what you think.

[/ QUOTE ]

brilliant. i can't stand the constant interruptions. i can barely watch basketball any longer. ncaa tourney is about it
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-09-2007, 07:36 PM
onlinebeginner onlinebeginner is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,780
Default Re: Would this make the NBA about 5,546 times better to watch?

[ QUOTE ]
timeouts set up awesome end of the game plays

[/ QUOTE ]

deron williams
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.