#1
|
|||
|
|||
Aq gets 4 bettet
Cryptologic
No Limit Holdem Ring game Blinds: $1/$2 6 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $196.63 UTG+1: $188.75 CO: $105.56 Button: $143 SB: $190.75 Hero: $223 Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is BB with Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, CO calls, <font color="#cc0000">Button raises to $8</font>, SB calls, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $35</font>, 3 folds, <font color="#cc0000">Button raises to $151</font>. I get roughly 1.8:1 odds. Itī`s just really -EV if he his range is QQ+,AK against every other range it`s *EV calling. What you think? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aq gets 4 bettet
I muck this pretty quickly. Not a huge fan of the 3bet either tbh.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aq gets 4 bettet
INSTAFOLD
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aq gets 4 bettet
Why? Isnt this a pretty standard 3-bet/squeeze?
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aq gets 4 bettet
A small raise over 3 limpers from a shortstack usually indicates a big hand to me.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aq gets 4 bettet
[ QUOTE ]
Stack sizes: Button: $143 (...) <font color="#cc0000">Button raises to $151</font>. [/ QUOTE ] O'RLY? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aq gets 4 bettet
That`s really strange. We are behind here, that`s right, but do we have the odds?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Aq gets 4 bettet
i think the squeeze is ok, and i definitely intamuck to the 4bet, but i do agree with Jay in that idiots who don't buy in full/don't reload, making a small raises after a bunch of people limp are looking for a bunch of action on their big hand because they are idiots.
IMO we have 3 outs vs his range most of the time |
|
|