33+ million hands - Page 4

Ratamahatta · #31 10-01-2007, 03:37 PM

why are those winrates so small?

Pat Southern · #32 10-01-2007, 03:42 PM

This is a 6.2 million hand database, DUCY?

Ratamahatta · #33 10-01-2007, 03:44 PM

lol at total rake [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

dirtylobster · #34 10-01-2007, 04:03 PM

FGators at 108k hands?

Jamougha · #35 10-01-2007, 04:09 PM

[ QUOTE ]
why are those winrates so small?

[/ QUOTE ]

Because anyone with a long-term expectation over 5 ptbb/100 moves up very fast, and because people are 8-tabling, and because it's not as easy to maintain high winrates as people think.

Windforce · #36 10-01-2007, 04:21 PM

lol total rake

Windforce · #37 10-01-2007, 04:22 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

i printed it off my other computer where i store all the hands (that computer is never online)

[/ QUOTE ]

How does the other computer get the hands if it's never online?

[/ QUOTE ]

he copies the hands on a floppy disk and then uploads it onto the second computer...so obv.

Windforce · #38 10-01-2007, 04:22 PM

because he is afraid that someone might hack into his computer and steal his precious work

carrotsnake · #39 10-01-2007, 04:30 PM

fgators plays on stars, whether thats a level or not

Fonkey123 · #40 10-01-2007, 04:39 PM

I don't understand how the W$SD isn't 50%?

or the fact it says 6.2 mil hands at the top graph unless that's just one database of 5.