Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-16-2007, 09:44 AM
bustedromo bustedromo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 406
Default multiaccounting tip of collusion iceberg ?

One aspect of just-banned multi-accounters on Stars which I'm not sure anyone has touched on yet:

I've long been suspicious of collusion amongst various top players. Could certain sets of players who know each other all nabbed for multi-accounting be evidence of an even larger crime ?

Works like this: A group of players collude in highly fluid manner. It's not about the same 2 or 3 players always sitting at the same table together. It's about jumping around to tables where one of your group is sitting, waiting for the right setup, hitting it, waiting a bit and then one of you leaving.

If a group is colluding in this manner and it's going well, greed might lead to sharing accounts. If group members are unavailable for any reason (sleep, sick, out), other members have the ability to log-in using their accounts and (1) put their money to work (2) distract suspicion by not overly concentrating their collusive activities on a single account.

Additionally, the $ variance of the accounts could lead to certain accounts quite robusto, others less robusto. Long-term you need to consistently bring the less robusto accounts up to snuff so they can jump into the most games.

Moving $ around with withdrawal/deposit is slow and tedious. Player-to-player transfers are probably the most heavily monitored by the poker sites. Overall, the best balance of speed and stealth is to chip dump from the more robust accounts into the less robust accounts.

I'm sure there are other reasons why members of a colluding group would want to share accounts.
  #2  
Old 08-16-2007, 09:51 AM
btmagnetw btmagnetw is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,713
Default Re: multiaccounting tip of collusion iceberg ?

do you have a magazine i can subscribe to?
  #3  
Old 08-16-2007, 09:56 AM
NickyC NickyC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 264
Default Re: multiaccounting tip of collusion iceberg ?

I dunno. All I care about is who the *&%^ threw the doomswitch on me last night.
  #4  
Old 08-16-2007, 09:56 AM
ShipitFMA ShipitFMA is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Getting my c-bets minraised
Posts: 2,486
Default Re: multiaccounting tip of collusion iceberg ?

*Cues exciting implications photo*
  #5  
Old 08-16-2007, 10:00 AM
Raised2Win Raised2Win is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 712
Default Re: multiaccounting tip of collusion iceberg ?

I think the biggest reason for sharing accounts is that a top player can play with someone else's screenname and be anonymous agains his regular opponents. Very useful in headsup games.

Blatant colluding is something I dont think happens too much in highstake games, but thats just what I think
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.