Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Would you rather:
Play in a serious game of dodgeball once every two months for the next 15 years. 30 56.60%
Not. 23 43.40%
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-22-2007, 06:39 PM
Nielsio Nielsio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,570
Default Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site

Any science-buffs care to comment on this?

[ QUOTE ]

Jones detailed his lab experiments in which he attempted to replicate NIST's conclusion that the lava like orange material flowing out of the south tower is aluminum from Flight 175, the plane that hit the building. Jones clearly documents the fact that liquid aluminum is silver and not orange as is seen in the video of the south tower, therefore the material cannot be aluminum. Jones then explains that the material is in fact a compound that can cut through steel like a hot knife through butter, thermite with sulphur added to make thermate.

The crux of the fresh evidence revolves around newly uncovered globules or spheres that were discovered at the WTC site that Professor Jones was able to obtain and run a electron microscope analysis on.

The spheres contained iron and aluminum, which would be expected in any steel sample, but also sulphur which is a by-product of a thermate reaction.

Video:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...08807350233932


http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles...demolition.htm


[/ QUOTE ]

The important bit is at 48 minutes.



If you don't want to talk science, take your cynicism elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-22-2007, 06:48 PM
arahant arahant is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 991
Default Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site

I'll be interested to see where this goes, but am not qualified to give an intelligent commentary on the evidence per se. My confession: I take the fact that the majority of scientists see no problem with what happened as evidence that what happened is physically possible. I don't believe we live in a country of 10's of thousands of metalurgists, all of whom actually KNOW that "fire can't melt steel", but only 2 of whom are willing to mention that publicly. I don't believe we live in a country where the leaders are devious enough to construct such an elaborate plot, actually fly jets in to buildings, but the plot is so stupid that they need to add thermite. I don't believe we live in a country where 100's of people would give testimony that supports some secret government lie. I guess what I'm saying is: any notion of conspiracy is so grotesquely absurd, so arrantly false, and so pathetic, that you are going to need a lot more than something like this to even get anyone half-way intelligent to give this a second thought. It shocks me the abilities that some people ascribe to our leaders.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-22-2007, 07:24 PM
SNOWBALL SNOWBALL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the citizens kneel 4 sex
Posts: 7,795
Default Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site

Nielso,

What % confidence do you have that the towers were brought down with explosives and not by the airplanes?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-22-2007, 07:59 PM
Nielsio Nielsio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,570
Default Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site

[ QUOTE ]
Nielso,

What % confidence do you have that the towers were brought down with explosives and not by the airplanes?

[/ QUOTE ]


ATM there is no such sequential mechanism theory that 'airplanes brought down the towers'; so it's pretty hard to get behind non-existent scientific theories.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-23-2007, 03:23 AM
SNOWBALL SNOWBALL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Where the citizens kneel 4 sex
Posts: 7,795
Default Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site

Nielso,

you think it's like 100% that it wasn't airplanes?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-23-2007, 05:54 AM
Nielsio Nielsio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,570
Default Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site

[ QUOTE ]
Nielso,

you think it's like 100% that it wasn't airplanes?

[/ QUOTE ]


[ QUOTE ]
ATM there is no such sequential mechanism theory that 'airplanes brought down the towers'; so it's pretty hard to get behind non-existent scientific theories.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-23-2007, 08:10 AM
kerowo kerowo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6,880
Default Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site

So when the Discovery Channel (America's Scientific Channel of Record) said the impact from the jets knocked off the fire retardant and the av-gas heated the steel enough for it to sag and pull away from the exterior walls trasfering the load they had been carrying to the structure below resulting in the buildings pancaking you say what?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-23-2007, 01:00 PM
mjkidd mjkidd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Supporting Ron Paul!
Posts: 1,517
Default Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site

[ QUOTE ]
Nielso,

you think it's like 100% that it wasn't airplanes?

[/ QUOTE ]

MS Paint of WTC being attacked by giant bears would KILL here.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-16-2007, 10:29 AM
Mr_Moore Mr_Moore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 452
Default Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site

at this site, http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm, why don't they debunk the theories against the pentagon?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-22-2007, 08:02 PM
Phil153 Phil153 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,905
Default Re: Electron microscope analysis of steel spheres from WTC site

[ QUOTE ]
Jones clearly documents the fact that liquid aluminum is silver and not orange as is seen in the video of the south tower, therefore the material cannot be aluminum

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't understand the other evidence, but this is just silly. Any number of pigments or lighting conditions can cause that color, and to claim "therefore the material cannot be aliminium" means the guy is probably an idiot.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.