|
|
#11
11-19-2007, 12:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Facing Raises in SB $600-$1000 NLHE
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] So all fold to the button who raises to 3.5 w/100 stacks. We call with AQs in the SB, or fold if we have QQ. Correct? [/ QUOTE ] [x] doesn't understand how important it is to have an overcard vs. button's obvious KK. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] did anyone notice that, apart from xaston, there was not a single intelligent, respectful and knowledgeble response to my question. [/ QUOTE ] LOLOLOL POTY!! 
|
|
#12
11-19-2007, 12:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Facing Raises in SB $600-$1000 NLHE
[ QUOTE ]
did anyone notice that, apart from xaston, there was not a single intelligent, respectful and knowledgeble response to my question. [/ QUOTE ] This is the best ive read on 2+2 in a long time.
|
|
#13
11-19-2007, 01:18 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Facing Raises in SB $600-$1000 NLHE
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] did anyone notice that, apart from xaston, there was not a single intelligent, respectful and knowledgeble response to my question. [/ QUOTE ] This is the best ive read on 2+2 in a long time. [/ QUOTE ] I also agree. Much of the site has become one huge clique. It has been like that quite a while. The trick is to find the few who share useful info, and ignore the rest. Just like life really.
|
|
#14
11-19-2007, 01:33 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Facing Raises in SB $600-$1000 NLHE
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] did anyone notice that, apart from xaston, there was not a single intelligent, respectful and knowledgeble response to my question. [/ QUOTE ] This is the best ive read on 2+2 in a long time. [/ QUOTE ] I also agree. Much of the site has become one huge clique. It has been like that quite a while. The trick is to find the few who share useful info, and ignore the rest. Just like life really. [/ QUOTE ] Whether or not 2+2 is "clique-y" - this post makes no sense whatsoever. Literally.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
