~~~ OFFICIAL YANKEES 2007 WORLD SERIES CHAMPIONS OR BUST THREAD ~~~

[ScottHoward v3.1]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
triumph,

i'll let you out of our bet for $99.50

[/ QUOTE ]

i saw this post and knew it was about that bet.

but there's still time.

[/ QUOTE ]
you guys still have time to bet on mussinas era
gogogo

[Triumph36]

[ QUOTE ]
hey al leiter when a guy pitches like 60% GB's his ERA WHEN NOBODY IS ON (wtf is the point of even mentioning that???) is .5 not worth mentioning...as a matter of fact, discussing anybodys ERA when NOBODY IS ON is retarded. who would even compile a stat like that?

how do these things not occur to these people?

[/ QUOTE ]

my head exploded when i heard this. i honestly think leiter didn't consider the ramifications - he had a point to make and damn it, he was gonna make it.

[NT!]

bebe,

i've got wakefield. even money.

and actually, after today, wake has a better ERA without the handicap.

[Triumph36]

[ QUOTE ]
bebe,

i've got wakefield. even money.

and actually, after today, wake has a better ERA without the handicap.

[/ QUOTE ]

in fairness to me, 3 weeks ago Clemens was about exactly .75 below Wakefield.

The line was pretty piss-poor on my part - .5 would've been a better one. However, it's not hard for Clemens to cut .37 off his ERA, and Wakefield add it to his. This bet is nowhere near over.

[g-bebe]

GL TO ALL INVOLVED LOL

thank god we finally gained a full game back on seattle today. it seems like... no, it actually HAS been like whenever we win, we don't gain any ground. time for seattle to play all those missed games and rack up some losses.

[NT!]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
bebe,

i've got wakefield. even money.

and actually, after today, wake has a better ERA without the handicap.

[/ QUOTE ]

in fairness to me, 3 weeks ago Clemens was about exactly .75 below Wakefield.

The line was pretty piss-poor on my part - .5 would've been a better one. However, it's not hard for Clemens to cut .37 off his ERA, and Wakefield add it to his. This bet is nowhere near over.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah i was actually going to offer you .5 before you proposed .75 [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

[Toro]

[ QUOTE ]
again, and for the last time.... wang and bonderman are very close in terms of effectiveness at this time and 'I' think bonderman will be better going forward.....to a noticeable degree. you can of course disagree, but since i am using PECOTA as my prediction machine, you will probably end up being wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't see the game so I don't know how much the vaunted yankee attack figures in but from the box score it looks like Wang was a lot better. Btw bonderman is 0-6 in his last 8 starts. But we can't go agianst pecota can we?

[craig]

[ QUOTE ]
But we can't go agianst pecota can we?

[/ QUOTE ]

Ahhh, SSS!!!

I think this is the second time this week someone pointed out Sublime was wrong after the fact.

craig

[Joe_d72]

Anyone watching the game on Extra Innings today? I cant find it.

[g-bebe]

granderson leads off with an inside-the-parker? woe is me

jamone yanks jamone