Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-16-2007, 03:20 AM
ranka ranka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 509
Default NL50: AK vs unknown, sudden turn agression.

Villain is UTG+1 and he is unknown again - 16/17 hands.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (8 handed) Poker Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Button ($31.85)
SB ($102.10)
BB ($28.55)
Hero ($64.55)
UTG+1 ($73.60)
MP1 ($25.65)
MP2 ($22)
CO ($51.25)

Preflop: Hero is UTG with K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $2</font>, UTG+1 calls $2, <font color="#666666">6 folds</font>.

Flop: ($4.75) 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $3.5</font>, UTG+1 calls $3.50.

Turn: ($11.75) J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets $8</font>, <font color="#CC3333">UTG+1 raises to $18</font>, Hero ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2007, 03:51 AM
AllTheCheese AllTheCheese is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 508
Default Re: NL50: AK vs unknown, sudden turn agression.

Fold. I usually c/c the turn here.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-16-2007, 03:54 AM
Lansingg Lansingg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 111
Default Re: NL50: AK vs unknown, sudden turn agression.

Fold it!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-16-2007, 03:56 AM
GiantBuddha GiantBuddha is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Hell\'s Kitchen
Posts: 1,461
Default Re: NL50: AK vs unknown, sudden turn agression.

I would only continue here with a very specific read. The jack is not a very good card for you at all. You're basically ahead of Acxc and like 8c9c, but AJ, 66, 77 seem much more likely.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.