X-Post from NVG: WCOOP ME champion is play2kill (Multi-Accounting)

[nath]

The fact that two hundred posts in you're still focused on the word "loner" while ignoring pretty much everything else I've written says a whole lot about your ability to respond to my argument in full.

Anyway. Carry on as usual. I'm trying not to step on anyone's toes.

[linuxrocks]

Can we get back to the topic of ME winner multi-accounting?

[Soulman]

[ QUOTE ]
Can we get back to the topic of ME winner multi-accounting?

[/ QUOTE ]
Nah, that's not important.

[pdjplano]

[ QUOTE ]
Can we get back to the topic of ME winner multi-accounting?

[/ QUOTE ]


PokerStars's standard practice is to conduct a special security review for players in each large tournament, including the Sunday Million and WCOOP events.

At this time the review is completed for all players in the WCOOP Main Event which concluded on October 1, except for the winner, where the investigation is continuing. We hope to conclude it as soon as possible.

The details of all security investigations are confidential.

This player has also requested that their personal information is not disclosed, and therefore PokerStars cannot divulge information about the player's identity.

Stephen W.
Manager, PokerStars Game Security

[Imrahil]

OMG PLZ DON'T GIVE LADYMAVERICK MORE MONIES

[Temp Hutter]

[ QUOTE ]
Possessions are definitely some part of the equation for self-worth

[/ QUOTE ]

For me this pretty much sums up why you are wrong in this thread. The people that derive their self worth from material possessions are never satisfied in life because they can never get enough. You will never fill that hole with a "lambo".

[augie_]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Possessions are definitely some part of the equation for self-worth

[/ QUOTE ]

For me this pretty much sums up why you are wrong in this thread. The people that derive their self worth from material possessions are never satisfied in life because they can never get enough. You will never fill that hole with a "lambo".

[/ QUOTE ]

Temp,

YOU CALL YOURSELF AN AMERICAN?!?!?!?!??!

[His Boy Elroy]

[ QUOTE ]

Please point out the definition I'm missing.

American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source - Share This
rich
adj. rich·er, rich·est

1. Possessing great material wealth: "Now that he was rich he was not thought ignorant any more, but simply eccentric" (Mavis Gallant).
2. Having great worth or value: a rich harvest of grain.
3. Magnificent; sumptuous: a rich brocade.
4.
1. Having an abundant supply: rich in ideas.
2. Abounding, especially in natural resources: rich land.
3. Containing a large amount of choice ingredients, such as butter, sugar, or eggs, and therefore unusually heavy or sweet: a rich dessert.
4. Having or exuding a strong or pungent aroma: "Texas air is so rich you can nourish off it like it was food" (Edna Ferber).
5. Pleasantly full and mellow: a rich tenor voice.
6. Warm and strong in color: a rich brown velvet.
5. Meaningful and significant: "a rich sense of the transaction between writer and reader" (William Zinsser).
6. Very productive and therefore financially profitable: rich seams of coal.
7.
1. Containing a large amount of choice ingredients, such as butter, sugar, or eggs, and therefore unusually heavy or sweet: a rich dessert.
2. Having or exuding a strong or pungent aroma: "Texas air is so rich you can nourish off it like it was food" (Edna Ferber).
3. Pleasantly full and mellow: a rich tenor voice.
4. Warm and strong in color: a rich brown velvet.
8.
1. Pleasantly full and mellow: a rich tenor voice.
2. Warm and strong in color: a rich brown velvet.
9. Containing a large proportion of fuel to air: a rich gas mixture.
10. Informal Highly amusing.

[/ QUOTE ]

p2k's life does NOT have choice butter or sugar imo

[NHFunkii]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Possessions are definitely some part of the equation for self-worth

[/ QUOTE ]

For me this pretty much sums up why you are wrong in this thread. The people that derive their self worth from material possessions are never satisfied in life because they can never get enough. You will never fill that hole with a "lambo".

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not very materialistic (I have no desire for a fancy car, watch, etc.), but that statement is ridiculous. It's hard to have self-worth when you have absolutely no possessions (sure, some people do, but that's not the point; possessions do play into self-worth in some way, whether you like it or not)

[A_PLUS]

I am starting to think STM may be a gimmick account started by my wife. If not, he is doing a remarkable job of using her goto PMS arguing strategy.

I will summarize:
-use a lot of words, the less they form a coherent point the better
-ignore 99% of what I say, and go insane trying to disprove one trivial point
-if you don't like a question, just talk about something you do like, especially if you can use flawed logic, and