Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Two Plus Two > MOD DISCUSSION
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 07-30-2007, 06:30 PM
Kedu Kedu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,033
Default Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)

Yeti,
"Call me paranoid, but I think Ed and I are on a list. I think that’s why we were BOTH “randomly” searched and why American Airlines wouldn’t let us sit together. We’re not on the NO FLY LIST yet, but I won’t be surprised if we get on it somehow. And then I’ll be telling a similar story to the one James Moore told"
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 07-30-2007, 06:32 PM
Quicksilvre Quicksilvre is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Clinging to the binomial theorem like a drunk to a lamppost
Posts: 3,482
Default Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)

[ QUOTE ]
Yeti,
"Call me paranoid, but I think Ed and I are on a list. I think that’s why we were BOTH “randomly” searched and why American Airlines wouldn’t let us sit together. We’re not on the NO FLY LIST yet, but I won’t be surprised if we get on it somehow. And then I’ll be telling a similar story to the one James Moore told"

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow. I thought you guys were just dishing on her for arguing with Mason. (Admittedly I haven't read the blog.)

This is a hardcore kind of crazy, right here. Crazy and fairly self-centered.
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 07-30-2007, 06:32 PM
MicroBob MicroBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The cat is back by popular demand.
Posts: 29,344
Default Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)

[ QUOTE ]
Cardo,

I believe rant was because he answered or didn't answer his cell phone to her satisfaction.

[/ QUOTE ]


I guess I partly agreed with her at the time on the 'appropriateness' of the horse-sex thread on 2+2.

But the whole argument about ElD's cell-phone and how/when to answer it was just over-the-top weird.
As the discussion developed she seemed to believe some comments were personal insults to her that clearly were just normal, everyday comments.

I think she was taking a lot of heat for her views from a lot of different posters by that time and that was skewing her perception of the intent of some of the other non-attack comments in that thread which she incorrectly viewed as attacks.
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 07-30-2007, 06:35 PM
Dids Dids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 215 lbs of fatness
Posts: 21,118
Default Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)

[ QUOTE ]
Dids,

Somehow I hadn't seen that before. Excellent. I especially liked the part where she enlarged and emboldened "randomly" searched to alert of us of the frequent troubles american-as-pie couples have when travelling by air.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think you realize the kinds of list that having a feminist blog gets you placed on. Elaine is an undesirable!!
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 07-30-2007, 06:38 PM
Yeti Yeti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,332
Default Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)

[ QUOTE ]
Yeti,
"Call me paranoid, but I think Ed and I are on a list. I think that’s why we were BOTH “randomly” searched and why American Airlines wouldn’t let us sit together. We’re not on the NO FLY LIST yet, but I won’t be surprised if we get on it somehow. And then I’ll be telling a similar story to the one James Moore told"

[/ QUOTE ]

hahahaha
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 07-30-2007, 06:41 PM
Anacardo Anacardo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: gorieslayer, Brightensbane
Posts: 7,014
Default Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)

[ QUOTE ]
It is at this exact moment where it becomes obvious that Ed's brain has been replaced with that of a pod person, because any reasonable person gets the [censored] out of this relationship when they realized they've married this degree of crazy.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dids you make way too big a deal of neuroses, generally. I did really enjoy your use of 'pod person,' though.
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 07-30-2007, 06:46 PM
Dids Dids is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 215 lbs of fatness
Posts: 21,118
Default Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)

Cardo,

That you are able to write off her actions in that post as simple "neuroses" and not "so detached from reason and logic as to render her functionally disabled" is kinda telling...
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 07-30-2007, 06:48 PM
Blarg Blarg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Who is Fistface?
Posts: 27,473
Default Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)

[ QUOTE ]
No Elaine thread would be complete without this link

http://www.elainevigneault.com/2006/...ines-rant.html

"I didn’t feel comfortable on that flight. I couldn’t trust these people. So I told Ed I didn’t want to fly; we had to get off the plane."

It is at this exact moment where it becomes obvious that Ed's brain has been replaced with that of a pod person, because any reasonable person gets the [censored] out of this relationship when they realized they've married this degree of crazy.

[/ QUOTE ]

haha, I remember that now -- that was amazing.
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 07-30-2007, 06:50 PM
Quicksilvre Quicksilvre is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Clinging to the binomial theorem like a drunk to a lamppost
Posts: 3,482
Default Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)

I just read the whole post.

Wooooooooow. Ed's a lucky guy.
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 07-30-2007, 06:52 PM
W brad W brad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 468
Default Re: Horse Porn? Seriously? (Elaine content!!)

The person who is really screwed here is Ed.

Anyone who has had a somewhat crazy person in the family knows how little you can do when that person goes off in public. You can't tell them to stop because they will turn on you for your lack of support and not seeing things their way. For the sake of domestic tranquility, you just have to grin and bear it. Ed can't tell us how he feels about all this because it will obviously get back to the crazy person.

Perhaps we should just allow Ed to endure his burden in private, we don't need to revisit every past controversy that the craxy person was involved in.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.