Which of these known female poker players could beat 4-8 NL online?

[olliejen]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you forgot vanessa selbst

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm pretty confident that vanessa is a better cash NL player than anybody on OP's original list.

[/ QUOTE ]

[cero_z]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you forgot vanessa selbst

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm 100% positive that vanessa is a better cash NL player than anybody on OP's original list.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[kiddynamite]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
you forgot vanessa selbst

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm 100% positive that vanessa is a better cash NL player than anybody on OP's original list.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]


lol selbstaments

[blankoblanco]

annette definitely could if she actually wanted to and set her mind to it. might not come to her instantly, but i don't think it'd take long. harman? maybe, but i only feel confident saying annette for sure. duke? no

[barryg1]

Mimi doesn't play that small, but she beats the 25-50 nl on stars is ahead of the 25-50 nl at the commerce. Her problem is that she has to support so many people.

You may recall that she is one of the biggest winners in the history of HSP and she only played 4 hours!

Barry

[NLSoldier]

[ QUOTE ]

Mimi doesn't play that small, but she beats the 25-50 nl on stars

[/ QUOTE ]

cmon barry we love you but what kind of sample size are you basing this off of? please correct me with PT screenshots if Im wrong but 25/50 on stars is like one of the very toughest poker games that goes on a regular basis in the whole world. saying she beats that game is essentially saying she is one of the top ~100(maybe less?) nl cash players in the world, i dont believe it.

[barryg1]

Sorry to disappoint you, but unlike some of the others, she is a professional cash game player. I think she prefers the 100-200 limit on stars, but she beats the no limit. That doesn't mean that she plays it all the time against the toughtest lineup.

As far as hours, Mimi averages more than 40 hours a week on the Internet in these games.

Barry

[Scotty_12]

[ QUOTE ]
You may recall that she is one of the biggest winners in the history of HSP and she only played 4 hours!

[/ QUOTE ]

lol samplesizeaments

[ski]

Poker ability =/ intelligence IMO.

I've met a lot of people that are mathamatical geniuses that couldn't beat poker even when I try and trach them. I've also met some poeple that I feel are pretty average intelligence that do great.

I think 5/10 is pretty tough to beat and people that are beating it take it for granted and easy in the same sense that most Brain surgeries are probably easy for brain surgens.

If u have a significant PT database take a look, not many people are beating 5/10 for a lot of money.

[Max Raker]

[ QUOTE ]

If u have a significant PT database take a look, not many people are beating 5/10 for a lot of money.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a good point. I looked through my database (6 max 5 10 NL over about a year), I see less than 10 people who I am sure are beating the game and possibly 5 or 6 more that are probably winners but I don't have enough hands to say for sure. There are many more who I am sure are losers.

Granted their is a selection bias in that I am more likely to have alot of hands with the bad players, but even taking that into account I thought their would be more people beating the game.

I still think most people in the list can either beat the game right now or at least would be able to after a few months of study.