|
|
#12
11-23-2007, 12:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KK vs short stack
would be a much easier call if your betsizes were better
if you bet 5/6 pot on flop, then 12/15 on turn it is no longer a decision as played, i call because of the odds also; preflop is fine. i usually only make it 5x, so saying we should raise more is going a bit too far 
|
|
#13
11-23-2007, 12:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KK vs short stack
Yea I agree I should have bet bigger on the flop, Im playing scared and badly right now. As far as pf, I agree with my bet is definitely enough.
|
|
#14
11-23-2007, 12:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KK vs short stack
Short stack + good odds = snap call.
In my experience short stacks just love to gamble. Especially the ones who buy in for a weird amount and probably are with their entire bankroll at the table.
|
|
#15
11-23-2007, 12:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KK vs short stack
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I feel like QQ and JJ are raising from the button, or at least limp-raising, no? My best guess is QJ, J9, Q9, or QT, JT, but two pair seems more likely. Maybe 50% two pair, 40% pair + oesd, 10% random cards we beat? Anybody care to comment on that range? [/ QUOTE ] Against a full stack I would smaller the pair + oesd part, but against a shorstack it prolly is a good assumption. But I think I'm stil giving him a tad more Two pairs than pair+oesd (solely based on Baluga, but I'm falling for this anyways, so I might not be correct). [/ QUOTE ] Baluga Theorem isn't as accurate against shorties because they will frequently shove turn with hands they would just call with sitting on deeper stacks.
|
|
#16
11-23-2007, 12:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KK vs short stack
[ QUOTE ]
Yea I agree I should have bet bigger on the flop, Im playing scared and badly right now. [/ QUOTE ] I like jamming it more against short stacks with these hands so I avoid these weird turn/river spots. I know I'm gonna feel committed and call them anyway, so I try to get enough money in to avoid the second-guessing on later streets.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
