Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #511  
Old 07-17-2006, 01:27 PM
crockpot crockpot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: /goggles fill up with tears / oh crap hold on can\'t see anything
Posts: 4,980
Default Re: *** Official St Louis Cardinals to the 2006 World Series Thread **

[ QUOTE ]
He has roughly 1400 hits in his first 11.5 years.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'll drop this argument because it's pointless, but august 1996-july 2006 is 10 years, not 11.5. either way, i admit rolen's hall chances are up in the air over any number of factors, so we'll wait and see.
Reply With Quote
  #512  
Old 07-17-2006, 01:35 PM
RunDownHouse RunDownHouse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nashville
Posts: 10,810
Default Re: *** Official St Louis Cardinals to the 2006 World Series Thread **

I don't know who Keith Law is, but reading that snippet makes me think he's just another ESPN idiot.
Reply With Quote
  #513  
Old 07-17-2006, 03:22 PM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: *** Official St Louis Cardinals to the 2006 World Series Thread **

[ QUOTE ]
I don't know who Keith Law is, but reading that snippet makes me think he just got a lobotomy

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP
Reply With Quote
  #514  
Old 07-17-2006, 03:43 PM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: *** Official St Louis Cardinals to the 2006 World Series Thread **

the more I think about this article, the more I realize this guy is a douche who has no idea about the Cards


He is so tied up in Pujols/Rolen/Edmonds that perhaps he didn't realize the Encarnacion guy he blasts is very comparable to, if not better than, Edmonds in terms of production at the plate.

To ridicule Eckstein and his moderately sized contract is just amazing. He must've gotten his facts wrong there somehow.

The Duncan/Taguchi/J-Rod position is not that bad. Sure, it would be nice to have more homers from that spot (Duncan provides that but also the strikeouts to go with), but they all hit for decent average and have been serviceable. Are they great? No. But they are not so bad.

The holes in the line-up have been Molina, who is turning it around after a horrible start, and Miles, who LaRussa insists on playing over Luna (the one thing Law did get right).

As Schwartzy pointed out, Mulder had two different first halves. Look at May 22nd and before. His ERA was 3.74 through that time and he had a good winning record. It was his last 5 starts or so, when his arm was nothing, that it fell apart. If he comes back solid, he should have a 'fresh' arm for the rest of the season. Carpenter and Mulder would be a solid 1-2 punch.

Jason Marquis is mister inconsistent his whole career. I am just hoping he is hot come September and October.

Suppan has always battled well for the Cards come playoff time.

Reyes shows promise.

Jeff Weaver might benefit from the change of scenery, and pitching coaches.

Are things rosy?
No

But they are not a mess
Reply With Quote
  #515  
Old 07-17-2006, 05:00 PM
djj6835 djj6835 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,609
Default Re: *** Official St Louis Cardinals to the 2006 World Series Thread **

[ QUOTE ]
I don't know who Keith Law is, but reading that snippet makes me think he's just another ESPN idiot

[/ QUOTE ]

Seriously, did this guy do any sort of research before writing this article. Especially his comments regarding John Rodriguez. Apparently Edmonds and his .800 OPS makes him one of only three decent hitters in the lineup and Rodriguez's .814 OPS is "so bad". The fact that he doesn't even acknowledge Eckstein's contributions is laughable and to not even mention Encarnacion while referring to Edmonds as one of their few offensive anchors is a joke.
Reply With Quote
  #516  
Old 07-17-2006, 05:51 PM
PTjvs PTjvs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Occupying a chair
Posts: 444
Default Re: *** Official St Louis Cardinals to the 2006 World Series Thread **

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
He has roughly 1400 hits in his first 11.5 years.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'll drop this argument because it's pointless, but august 1996-july 2006 is 10 years, not 11.5. either way, i admit rolen's hall chances are up in the air over any number of factors, so we'll wait and see.

[/ QUOTE ]

You are correct of course. My bad.

jvs
Reply With Quote
  #517  
Old 07-17-2006, 05:57 PM
PTjvs PTjvs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Occupying a chair
Posts: 444
Default Re: *** Official St Louis Cardinals to the 2006 World Series Thread **

You can certainly argue that the Cards are a mess. Their current record would have put them 7 games back last year, and the starting pitching is atrocious. You point out that Mulder has been good at stretches this year, and that if his arm returns to form that you will have 2 (3 with Reyes) good SPs. Take the other side of the arguement however; if Mulder continues to struggle mightily, as he has lately, your rotation is pretty much in shambles.

However, there isn't a team in the NL outside of NYM that I wouldn't argue to be medicore at best, ahd the NYM Met starting pitching probably isn't going to dominate anyone is a postseason series either, so even the Mets can be had. The key is to be less of a mess than your competitors.

jvs
Reply With Quote
  #518  
Old 07-17-2006, 06:11 PM
Schwartzy61 Schwartzy61 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Finishing Dead Last
Posts: 2,236
Default Re: *** Official St Louis Cardinals to the 2006 World Series Thread **

[ QUOTE ]
You can certainly argue that the Cards are a mess. Their current record would have put them 7 games back last year, and the starting pitching is atrocious.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah 7 games back of themselves, 6 ahead of Chicago for the division lead and 1/2 a game away from the best record in the NL. Your quote just shows how much better last year's team had performed to this point, and considering this team isn't that much different than the current one, shows some hope for this team even if they don't eventually capitalize on the opportunity.

[ QUOTE ]
You point out that Mulder has been good at stretches this year, and that if his arm returns to form that you will have 2 (3 with Reyes) good SPs. Take the other side of the arguement however; if Mulder continues to struggle mightily, as he has lately, your rotation is pretty much in shambles.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well assuming Mulder's trouble was health and he comes back from the DL healthy then he's fine. If of course he doesn't get healthy then he won't exactly be in the rotation. And hopefully the Cardinals second most valuable pitcher to this point gets point in his spot. While the SP is a pretty big mess at this point, considering 3 of the starters performed well below career averages, it wouldn't be surprising to see them turn it around a little. So while its bleek, there is a little ray of sunshine. It's not like the team is loaded with guys that just can't pitch, it's just right now they seem to have forgotten how to...hopefully a couple of them "remember" in time...

[ QUOTE ]
However, there isn't a team in the NL outside of NYM that I wouldn't argue to be medicore at best, ahd the NYM Met starting pitching probably isn't going to dominate anyone is a postseason series either, so even the Mets can be had. The key is to be less of a mess than your competitors.

jvs

[/ QUOTE ]

Exactly, there is no reason to think this team won't be in the NLCS given the state of the NL. As for the WS? Eh...even if the Cardinals had the talent/were good enough I'm sure LaRussa would find a way to screw it up...
Reply With Quote
  #519  
Old 07-17-2006, 08:07 PM
RunDownHouse RunDownHouse is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Nashville
Posts: 10,810
Default Re: *** Official St Louis Cardinals to the 2006 World Series Thread **

Nice intro, Weaver!

Most worrying to me is that he's already had several 8+ pitch at-bats.
Reply With Quote
  #520  
Old 07-17-2006, 08:12 PM
Schwartzy61 Schwartzy61 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Finishing Dead Last
Posts: 2,236
Default Re: *** Official St Louis Cardinals to the 2006 World Series Thread **

[ QUOTE ]
Nice intro, Weaver!

Most worrying to me is that he's already had several 8+ pitch at-bats.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah the 6 hits, 2 BB, and 5 ERs in 3 IP are nothing to worry about...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.