Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-28-2007, 02:33 PM
anti1k anti1k is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 33
Default Re: 77 line check

I usually fold in those spots, but if Oink says that is mistake I belive him. But I think calling is worse option here than folding.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-28-2007, 02:40 PM
Realyn Realyn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 70
Default Re: 77 line check

edit:missread
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-28-2007, 02:49 PM
numbnuts007 numbnuts007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 451
Default Re: 77 line check

[ QUOTE ]
Assuming a scenario in which button folds hero has 12.3% eq vs QQ, KK, AA. Thats about 3 outs

Now add AdKd and AQs and Hero has about 14.7% eq; about 3.5 outs.

In any case. Folding if it gets 3-bet is a mistake IMO. In particular considering the great implied vs KK and AA

[/ QUOTE ]

So if we raise, get it heads up, bb 3-bets and we call, bb leads turn, you think we should still call? You can't be thinking sd if it gets 3-bet on the flop can you?

I know, I know, stop folding.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-28-2007, 02:59 PM
Realyn Realyn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 70
Default Re: 77 line check

[ QUOTE ]
Assuming a scenario in which button folds hero has 12.3% eq vs QQ, KK, AA. Thats about 3 outs

Now add AdKd and AQs and Hero has about 14.7% eq; about 3.5 outs.

In any case. Folding if it gets 3-bet is a mistake IMO. In particular considering the great implied vs KK and AA

[/ QUOTE ]correct me if im wrong, but you are talking about the equity for both the turn and the river, right? so hero would pay 3 small bets to win 17(10+5+2). Thats 3:17 + 4-5 implied.

my point is, u cant say hero has 12 % equity and needs to call ONE small bet with the pot offering 15. To make full use from those 13 % equity he needs to call 3
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-28-2007, 03:07 PM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: 77 line check

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Assuming a scenario in which button folds hero has 12.3% eq vs QQ, KK, AA. Thats about 3 outs

Now add AdKd and AQs and Hero has about 14.7% eq; about 3.5 outs.

In any case. Folding if it gets 3-bet is a mistake IMO. In particular considering the great implied vs KK and AA

[/ QUOTE ]

So if we raise, get it heads up, bb 3-bets and we call, bb leads turn, you think we should still call? You can't be thinking sd if it gets 3-bet on the flop can you?

I know, I know, stop folding.

[/ QUOTE ]

Then I'd fold turn UI

Call if I pick up a fd, gut or a set (raise a set)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-28-2007, 03:12 PM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: 77 line check

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Assuming a scenario in which button folds hero has 12.3% eq vs QQ, KK, AA. Thats about 3 outs

Now add AdKd and AQs and Hero has about 14.7% eq; about 3.5 outs.

In any case. Folding if it gets 3-bet is a mistake IMO. In particular considering the great implied vs KK and AA

[/ QUOTE ]correct me if im wrong, but you are talking about the equity for both the turn and the river, right? so hero would pay 3 small bets to win 17(10+5+2). Thats 3:17 + 4-5 implied.

my point is, u cant say hero has 12 % equity and needs to call ONE small bet with the pot offering 15. To make full use from those 13 % equity he needs to call 3

[/ QUOTE ]

No!

If you raise and BB 3-bets then you get 15:1 odds. To call that you need a little less than 3 outs to call. The decision at that point is only about that 1 bet. Not the 3-bets you put in in total on the street given that scenario.

Against QQ+ hero has about 3 outs

Add AdKd and AQs and he has about 3.5 outs.

I just used stove to figure out the number of outs as its difficult to count backdoor outs precisely when you want your average # of outs.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-28-2007, 03:12 PM
FlopYouDead FlopYouDead is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 49
Default Re: 77 line check

I'm giving BB a wider range. At this point (on the flop) it's just a standard C-bet. AK-, JJ- don't have a lot of equity vs Hero's range once he raises. I think a 3bet from BB here is especially strong.

Maybe I overvalued the outs but I counted 2 set outs, and 2 1.5 out draws, discounting both by .5. If it's 3.5 then ok.

In any event we have enough to continue provided we get it HU. If we know BTN will play on then flop is a fold, imo. If BTN peels it is likely for the same reasons we are, i.e. bdsd, bdfd and in his case an overcard, in which case our fd is tainted badly and our 77 much less likely to hold up if good.

*edit* to clarify in light of other posts I'm not suggesting fold to 3bet
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-28-2007, 03:15 PM
Realyn Realyn is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 70
Default Re: 77 line check

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Assuming a scenario in which button folds hero has 12.3% eq vs QQ, KK, AA. Thats about 3 outs

Now add AdKd and AQs and Hero has about 14.7% eq; about 3.5 outs.

In any case. Folding if it gets 3-bet is a mistake IMO. In particular considering the great implied vs KK and AA

[/ QUOTE ]correct me if im wrong, but you are talking about the equity for both the turn and the river, right? so hero would pay 3 small bets to win 17(10+5+2). Thats 3:17 + 4-5 implied.

my point is, u cant say hero has 12 % equity and needs to call ONE small bet with the pot offering 15. To make full use from those 13 % equity he needs to call 3

[/ QUOTE ]

No!

If you raise and BB 3-bets then you get 15:1 odds. To call that you need a little less than 3 outs to call. The decision at that point is only about that 1 bet. Not the 3-bets you put in in total on the street given that scenario.

Against QQ+ hero has about 3 outs

Add AdKd and AQs and he has about 3.5 outs.

I just used stove to figure out the number of outs as its difficult to count backdoor outs precisely when you want your average # of outs.

[/ QUOTE ]I agree with 3 outs on the flop.

it was just pretty confusing bringing the overall equity in
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-28-2007, 03:18 PM
numbnuts007 numbnuts007 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 451
Default Re: 77 line check

[ QUOTE ]
Then I'd fold turn UI

Call if I pick up a fd, gut or a set (raise a set)

[/ QUOTE ]

word.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-28-2007, 03:22 PM
Oink Oink is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SLAAAYYYERRRR ! ! ! !
Posts: 4,226
Default Re: 77 line check

If you have x clean outs to the nuts where villain will have no redraw then your eq vs a random hand is

x/45 + ((45-x)/45)*(x/44)

Likewise if you stove your hand vs a range then you can use this equation to figure out your "clean" # of outs or average # of outs

x/45 + ((45-x)/45)*(x/44) = 12.6% is solved by aproxx 3.

So instead of making a tedious counting of outs you can just use stove and solve that equation in excel
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.