Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-26-2007, 01:30 PM
Nielsio Nielsio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,570
Default FT200 No pair against a maniac

Full Tilt Poker, $1/$2 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 6 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

BTN: $556.90
Hero (SB): $194.20
BB: $424.05
UTG: $223
MP: $92.30
CO: $33

Pre-Flop: K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (SB)
3 folds, <font color="red">BTN raises to $4</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $16</font>, BB folds, BTN calls $12

Flop: ($34) 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $24</font>, <font color="red">BTN raises to $48</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises to $178.20 and is All-In</font>



BTN is 68/41/3.3/44 .
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-26-2007, 01:32 PM
Requin Requin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Back online
Posts: 6,446
Default Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac

Meh I do this too, never ran the math tho so idk
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-26-2007, 01:42 PM
Nick Royale Nick Royale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sverige
Posts: 6,815
Default Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac

I think this is ok. We often have 6 outs if behind, there's likely a bunch of FDs in his range and it could easily be some kind of bluff with whatever. I think we have 25ish equity vs his calling range (assuming his calling range is PP, FD, 4x 9x).

Does 44 stand for wtsd or hands?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-26-2007, 01:44 PM
Nielsio Nielsio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,570
Default Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac

[ QUOTE ]
I think this is ok. We often have 6 outs if behind, there's likely a bunch of FDs in his range and it could easily be some kind of bluff with whatever. I think we have 25ish equity vs his calling range (assuming his calling range is PP, FD, 4x 9x).

Does 44 stand for wtsd or hands?

[/ QUOTE ]


Hands
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-26-2007, 01:46 PM
Nick Royale Nick Royale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sverige
Posts: 6,815
Default Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think this is ok. We often have 6 outs if behind, there's likely a bunch of FDs in his range and it could easily be some kind of bluff with whatever. I think we have 25ish equity vs his calling range (assuming his calling range is PP, FD, 4x 9x).

Does 44 stand for wtsd or hands?

[/ QUOTE ]


Hands

[/ QUOTE ]
Ok that makes me a bit less likely to pull this move. In that case I'd like to have some real read that he plays like an idiot. It's probably still ok though.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-26-2007, 01:51 PM
dirtylobster dirtylobster is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,124
Default Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac

It's fine as long as it doesn't tilt you when he calls you with 33 and wins.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-26-2007, 01:57 PM
Money2Burn Money2Burn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Florida, imo
Posts: 943
Default Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac

I'm not sure if I like this, except for all out bluffs he is going to be ahead. If he really is a maniac, he isn't folding anything that is ahead of us and calling very little that is behind. Against guys like this I fold, you can always find better spots against them.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-26-2007, 02:12 PM
RickOSU RickOSU is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 389
Default Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac

i like it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-26-2007, 03:17 PM
Money2Burn Money2Burn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Florida, imo
Posts: 943
Default Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac

[ QUOTE ]
i like it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you mind giving your reasoning here? I honestly don't see how this could be anything but a spew against a maniac.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-26-2007, 03:20 PM
ajmargarine ajmargarine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: one decision
Posts: 12,050
Default Re: FT200 No pair against a maniac

Word of advice: It's generally a good idea to make a hand vs a 68/41 and then bet said hand. A hand would be a pair or greater.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.