#1
|
|||
|
|||
i 3-bet with 2nd nut. villain calls. i\'m good, rite?
live $4/8. villain is a loose station and just saw him call on river for one bet with a full house, where the only hand that could beat him was 4-of-a-kind.
i call with K [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 6 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] on button. 5 to the flop. Flop: 6 [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 10 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Villain bets out from BB, one caller, i raise, both call. 3 to the turn. Turn: 5 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] They check to me, i bet, they both call. River: Q [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] They check to me, i bet, villain in BB craises, 1 fold, i reraise, villain CALLS with A [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 9 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] so, ya, he saved me money by not 4-betting, but should i have 3-bet in the first place? given the betting pattern, i figured a good % of the time, he might have hit his straight on the river and not put me on the flush. but again, i had seen him flat call with a full house a couple hands ago, should i not have 3-bet this? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i 3-bet with 2nd nut. villain calls. i\'m good, rite?
You're fine.
-McGee |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i 3-bet with 2nd nut. villain calls. i\'m good, rite?
u said it urself he's a loose station so he could be raising with straight or lower flush here, so what u did is justified.
btw;he must be scared of u for him not to 4 bet u. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: i 3-bet with 2nd nut. villain calls. i\'m good, rite?
i have the nuts, i call
|
|
|