Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-19-2007, 01:29 AM
KRANTZ KRANTZ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: the 1980s
Posts: 4,999
Default Re: bottom set with deep stacks

i'm with catcher, and you can ask jfish
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-19-2007, 01:32 AM
xorbie xorbie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: far and away better
Posts: 15,690
Default Re: bottom set with deep stacks

[ QUOTE ]
Xorbie,
I find it hard to believe he would complete 66/TT here especiall TT.

[/ QUOTE ]

id say 66 is probably his most likely hand. given that he's clearly a player who is completing something, i think medium pairs are certainly the type of hand he'd do it with.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-19-2007, 01:38 AM
bboy_ bboy_ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 761
Default Re: bottom set with deep stacks

you have a set and can't fold here. you are behind exactly 66 only. he could have soo many other hands here. a read would be good, but i'd say anything that will get the stacks in works well.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-19-2007, 01:38 AM
aislephive aislephive is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: And now the children are asleep
Posts: 6,874
Default Re: bottom set with deep stacks

[ QUOTE ]
does he show up with 46 here? big draw? your probably beat way more often than people here are making it seem.

[/ QUOTE ]

So what are you advocating, a fold?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-19-2007, 01:41 AM
Better Than U Better Than U is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: MurderingU
Posts: 965
Default Re: bottom set with deep stacks

I fold here. Big draw or bigger set.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-19-2007, 01:43 AM
spino1i spino1i is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: im a tagfish that always folds
Posts: 2,429
Default Re: bottom set with deep stacks

Hmm.. battle of the blinds and you have a set. I push. Sucks if he has 66 (I doubt he has TT as he would have raised pre-flop), but you cant play scared of one hand.

800 is pretty much the same as a push, since you get it all-in on the turn anyway. The only question is which one gets looked up more, which is villain dependant.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-19-2007, 01:46 AM
restrikt restrikt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,312
Default Re: bottom set with deep stacks

How deep do we have to be before this is not an instapush?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-19-2007, 01:50 AM
BobboFitos BobboFitos is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Somerville
Posts: 10,043
Default Re: bottom set with deep stacks

[ QUOTE ]
How deep do we have to be before this is not an instapush?

[/ QUOTE ]

100000bbs
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-19-2007, 01:51 AM
catcher193 catcher193 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: min-raising and donk-betting
Posts: 3,671
Default Re: bottom set with deep stacks

[ QUOTE ]
How deep do we have to be before this is not an instapush?

[/ QUOTE ]
350BB?? it sucks because this flop was taken for only 1 raise.

edit: 500BB?? I mean in this EXACT given situation somewhere around here is where I start to draw the line.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-19-2007, 01:53 AM
skier_5 skier_5 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: praha
Posts: 3,415
Default Re: bottom set with deep stacks

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How deep do we have to be before this is not an instapush?

[/ QUOTE ]

1036452.5bbs

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.