|
|
|
|
#1
12-01-2007, 10:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: *** Official *** BluffTHIS! Cyrus accusation containment thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] mrick chances of being cyrus are between 33% and 20%, discuss. [/ QUOTE ] 10 seconds worth of effort to perform a user name search shows that Mickey/Cyrus was banned ~Mar 07 while mrick reg'd Apr 06 and has been a regular since it looks like. Of course, let's not let inconvenient facts or a little sleuthing get in the way of a Bluffthistroll's witch hunt. [/ QUOTE ] And this proves he isnt the same person how? [/ QUOTE ] Proof? Where did I claim to "prove" anything? Even a court of law only requires reasonable doubt. I just gave you plenty of grounds for that. So where's the "proof" that he is in fact Cyrus? Let us see it. [/ QUOTE ] Ok Im really not down with getting involved in this drama. I just thought it was ridiculous to use that as proof or even reasonable doubt in the case of a person that was known to have used more than one account.... [/ QUOTE ] Why would Cyrus have come back as Mickey Brausch once he was banned if he was already actively using the mrick account? You really don't think there's even a hint of "reasonable doubt" here? I sincerely hope you never serve on a jury or court-martial, sir. 
|
|
#2
12-01-2007, 10:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** Official *** BluffTHIS! Cyrus accusation containment thread
[ QUOTE ]
Why would Cyrus have come back as Mickey Brausch once he was banned if he was already actively using the mrick account? [/ QUOTE ] I'm not convinced that mrick = cyrus, but Cyrus is NOT dumb and he was SO transparent in posting as MB that he had to figure that someone would catch on and give him the boot.
|
|
#3
12-02-2007, 01:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: *** Official *** BluffTHIS! Cyrus accusation containment thread
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] mrick chances of being cyrus are between 33% and 20%, discuss. [/ QUOTE ] 10 seconds worth of effort to perform a user name search shows that Mickey/Cyrus was banned ~Mar 07 while mrick reg'd Apr 06 and has been a regular since it looks like. Of course, let's not let inconvenient facts or a little sleuthing get in the way of a Bluffthistroll's witch hunt. [/ QUOTE ] And this proves he isnt the same person how? [/ QUOTE ] Proof? Where did I claim to "prove" anything? Even a court of law only requires reasonable doubt. I just gave you plenty of grounds for that. So where's the "proof" that he is in fact Cyrus? Let us see it. [/ QUOTE ] Ok Im really not down with getting involved in this drama. I just thought it was ridiculous to use that as proof or even reasonable doubt in the case of a person that was known to have used more than one account.... [/ QUOTE ] Why would Cyrus have come back as Mickey Brausch once he was banned if he was already actively using the mrick account? You really don't think there's even a hint of "reasonable doubt" here? I sincerely hope you never serve on a jury or court-martial, sir. [/ QUOTE ] Sure, I'll give you a "hint of a reasonable doubt"; I'm feeling magnanimous tonight. I just hope that I one day possess the acumen and the keen analytical skills to see, as you do, why the registration date matters in the case of a person that was known to use more than one account, on a board where the creation of a new account is trivially easy, sir. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
