#1
|
|||
|
|||
($24) PF decision with TT and 13bb
The limper is a loose player, MP1 is 18/9.
Full Tilt Poker No Limit Holdem Tournament Blinds: t60/t120 8 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: t1120 UTG+1: t960 MP1: t1110 MP2: t1550 CO: t1220 Button: t4180 SB: t1815 Hero: t1545 Pre-flop: (8 players) Hero is BB with T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] UTG folds, UTG+1 calls t120 <font color="aaaaaa">(pot was t180)</font>, <font color="#cc0000">MP1 raises all-in t1110</font>, 4 folds, Hero? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($24) PF decision with TT and 13bb
If MP knows utg+1 is limping very loose, this may be a semi-move with hands in the bottom of his range (like all the way down to 55/A9 maybe). I think I'd call in this spot if MP1 is a regular (and observant). Without that read I'd fold.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($24) PF decision with TT and 13bb
With these chip stack sizes I would call. It's a borderline situation. It's obviously a gamble, but at this tight table, take a chance.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($24) PF decision with TT and 13bb
snap it, yo.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($24) PF decision with TT and 13bb
[ QUOTE ]
If MP knows utg+1 is limping very loose, this may be a semi-move with hands in the bottom of his range (like all the way down to 55/A9 maybe). I think I'd call in this spot if MP1 is a regular (and observant). Without that read I'd fold. [/ QUOTE ] I need to know that this makes a significant amount of his range. But I see AJ/Q here a lot which is not a situation I Want to be in. Also and bwiii FWIW I haven't seen a post of yours that i would agree with yet, not necesarrily your actions but your reasoning I find often false. I haven't been around for a month here but am coming back. I will hold judgement for a while, welcome to the forum. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($24) PF decision with TT and 13bb
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If MP knows utg+1 is limping very loose, this may be a semi-move with hands in the bottom of his range (like all the way down to 55/A9 maybe). I think I'd call in this spot if MP1 is a regular (and observant). Without that read I'd fold. [/ QUOTE ] I need to know that this makes a significant amount of his range. But I see AJ/Q here a lot which is not a situation I Want to be in. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, but we call them ranges for a reason. And I hate to see AQ/AJ but I'm ahead of both (not to say that if I felt that his range was AJ+ I'd call). My view? This kind of decision is pretty close for me, and I would probably fold without a read, call if I felt that he'll do it with a bigger range. [ QUOTE ] Also and bwiii FWIW I haven't seen a post of yours that i would agree with yet, not necesarrily your actions but your reasoning I find often false. I haven't been around for a month here but am coming back. I will hold judgement for a while, welcome to the forum. [/ QUOTE ] I think you need to discuss where he is going wrong, if you think he is. There's no value to your comment if you don't. |
|
|