#1
|
|||
|
|||
Mansion $100k Guaranteed - AA in 1st Level - Standard?
Hello there! I lurk here often but have yet to post a hand history, and unfortunately I'm having trouble converting this Mansion HH into a better format so I apologise if this is difficult to read.
This is a hand I wanted to discuss from the Mansion $100k guaranteed tourney ($100 Buy-in). It happened very early on (Hand 6) so very little history. The only notable hand I played previous to this was the following (Any thoughts on this hand also greatly appreciated, I felt I played it too weak but didn't want to overcommit to AK too early): PokerStars Game #25935207: Hold'em No Limit (0) - 2007/07/14 - 20:05:16 (ET) Table 'Mansion' 9-max Seat #2 is the button Seat 1: Sophabella ($2,590.00 in chips) Seat 2: HERO ($2,470.00 in chips) Seat 3: bibus ($2,440.00 in chips) Seat 4: letham ($2,500.00 in chips) Seat 5: RUIB ($2,500.00 in chips) Seat 6: Royal Flush ($2,500.00 in chips) Seat 7: CatfishTPA ($2,530.00 in chips) Seat 8: MarinaY ($2,500.00 in chips) Seat 9: Teach Me Pls ($2,470.00 in chips) bibus: posts small blind $10 letham: posts big blind $20 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to HERO [Ad Kh] RUIB: folds Royal Flush: folds CatfishTPA: folds MarinaY: folds Teach Me Pls: folds Sophabella: folds HERO: raises to $80 bibus: raises to $260 letham: folds HERO: calls $260 *** FLOP *** [3s 4c Qd] bibus: checks HERO: checks *** TURN *** [3s 4c Qd] [6s] bibus: bets $540 HERO: folds bibus collected $540 from pot bibus: mucks *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $540 | Rake $0 Board [3s 4c Qd 6s] Seat 3: bibus collected ($540) Two hands later this hand comes up. Does this seem standard or should it have been played differently? PokerStars Game #25935348: Hold'em No Limit (0) - 2007/07/14 - 20:07:22 (ET) Table 'Mansion' 9-max Seat #4 is the button Seat 1: Sophabella ($2,590.00 in chips) Seat 2: HERO ($2,190.00 in chips) Seat 3: bibus ($2,770.00 in chips) Seat 4: letham ($2,470.00 in chips) Seat 5: RUIB ($2,480.00 in chips) Seat 6: Royal Flush ($2,500.00 in chips) Seat 7: CatfishTPA ($2,530.00 in chips) Seat 8: MarinaY ($2,500.00 in chips) Seat 9: Teach Me Pls ($2,470.00 in chips) RUIB: posts small blind $10 Royal Flush: posts big blind $20 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to HERO [Ad As] CatfishTPA: raises to $80 MarinaY: folds Teach Me Pls: folds Sophabella: folds HERO: raises to $300 bibus: folds letham: folds RUIB: folds Royal Flush: times out and folds CatfishTPA: calls $300 *** FLOP *** [4c 9c Ks] CatfishTPA: bets $140 HERO: raises to $700 CatfishTPA: calls $700 *** TURN *** [4c 9c Ks] [Jh] CatfishTPA: checks HERO: bets $1190 and is all-in CatfishTPA: calls $1190 I felt that my bet sizing was fine but wanted to hear some more experienced opinions (I don't usually play such high buy-in tournaments but have been hoping to play this one for a while!) All input appreciated. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mansion $100k Guaranteed - AA in 1st Level - Standard?
good.
sorry you got bad beat. welcome to the forums. you should read the anthology sticky atop the regular MTT forum. some valuable info in those threads |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Mansion $100k Guaranteed - AA in 1st Level - Standard?
How about the AK hand? Did I play it too weakly? Should I reraise PF since he could interpret my button raise as a much wider range?
|
|
|