Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-23-2007, 01:42 PM
soon2bepro soon2bepro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,275
Default Re: Ideal effective stack size for NLHE cash

[ QUOTE ]
Are you even reading what I'm posting? I'm trying to answer your question, but you seem to have your mind made up already. If you don't like some of these responses, maybe you could just stop posting threads?

[/ QUOTE ]

I am reading what you're saying. It just seems you didn't even bother to read the OP fully. Like you wanted to talk about something else and went on about it.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-24-2007, 07:32 AM
deucethree deucethree is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 81
Default Re: Ideal effective stack size for NLHE cash

[ QUOTE ]
If you can limp in you see every flop and play only the nuts.

[/ QUOTE ]

This wouldn't be easily exploitable or anything...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-24-2007, 09:08 AM
soon2bepro soon2bepro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,275
Default Re: Ideal effective stack size for NLHE cash

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If you can limp in you see every flop and play only the nuts.

[/ QUOTE ]

This wouldn't be easily exploitable or anything...

[/ QUOTE ]

bluffs are a part of any poker game, just because occasional bluffs are possible doesn't mean the game is strategically complex
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-25-2007, 12:00 AM
deucethree deucethree is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 81
Default Re: Ideal effective stack size for NLHE cash

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If you can limp in you see every flop and play only the nuts.

[/ QUOTE ]

This wouldn't be easily exploitable or anything...

[/ QUOTE ]

bluffs are a part of any poker game, just because occasional bluffs are possible doesn't mean the game is strategically complex

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you aren't getting responses because you're describing a situation that doesn't (shouldn't) exist.

Your argument against deep stack nlhe is that it turns into a game of calling with any two and then peddling the nuts. Obviously this isn't the case as any semi-competent opponent would easily beat that strategy. Raise, c-bet, fold on the rare occasion that you meet resistance.

As far as the strategic complexity you're asking for, as has been said deep stack allows for more decisions on more streets for more chips. Don't know what else you're looking for.

This kind of reminds me of the brad booth huge pre-flop raise discussion/situation.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-25-2007, 02:43 AM
soon2bepro soon2bepro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,275
Default Re: Ideal effective stack size for NLHE cash

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If you can limp in you see every flop and play only the nuts.

[/ QUOTE ]

This wouldn't be easily exploitable or anything...

[/ QUOTE ]

bluffs are a part of any poker game, just because occasional bluffs are possible doesn't mean the game is strategically complex

[/ QUOTE ]

As far as the strategic complexity you're asking for, as has been said deep stack allows for more decisions on more streets for more chips. Don't know what else you're looking for.


[/ QUOTE ]

If that's true, that's all I'm looking for. I just don't see it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.