Prima MGR vs. PT "Total Rake"

[jrz1972]

I know this is a basic question, but I didn't see anything on this topic when I ran a search.

It seems to me that your Prima MGR should track your actual rake paid much more closely than other methods, assuming you're a run-of-the-mill 2+2 TAG. Obviously the "dealt" method results in people like us having an MGR substantially greater than our actual rake, but it seems like the "weighted contributed" method should be a lot closer.

The only player type I can think of who would get an MGR much above his actual rake would the be the guy who consistently goes to showdown and loses, but Prima doesn't seem to have as many of those kind of guys as Party and other sites.

I'm just curious about to what extent I can just look at my PT numbers to get a good approximation of my MGR should be. I know I can track this at my Prima skin directly as well, but it's nice to confirm if the numbers more or less match up.

[Psy_Mike]

Approc (PT rake)*0.84 for the Prima MGR works for me and my stats at least!

GL! [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[MegaDisgruntled]

I take my total PT rake and then multiply it by the % that I am getting. Oddly enough, it's very close to actual.

Les

[scorer]

Let's use this example prima players, if one gets 60 percent compared to 27 dealt cards/which one is better or will reward more rb for the player.

[ninenine_zoe]

[ QUOTE ]
Let's use this example prima players, if one gets 60 percent compared to 27 dealt cards/which one is better or will reward more rb for the player.

[/ QUOTE ]
you cant compare this without knowing the stakes, full or short and limit/NL.

[scorer]

NL 50 or NL 100. 6 max tables.

[scorer]

i cashout daily on prima and without alot of play it really adds up quickly. Anybody else on dealt cards/contr rake equations