Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: I have experienced sleep paralysis
No 27 43.55%
Yes 35 56.45%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-31-2006, 05:35 PM
NT! NT! is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: i ain\'t got my taco
Posts: 17,165
Default Re: 2007 MLB HOF Voting Poll

Yeah, what's with the no love for the career saves leader?

NT
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-31-2006, 06:10 PM
prohornblower prohornblower is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: learning the hockey-stop.
Posts: 8,016
Default Re: 2007 MLB HOF Voting Poll

Dawson, Blyleven, Smith, Gwynn, Ripken Jr., McGwire
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-31-2006, 06:22 PM
battschr battschr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Somewhere where I don\'t know where I am.
Posts: 1,517
Default Re: 2007 MLB HOF Voting Poll

Ripken, Gwynn, Mcgwire, Dawson, Blyleven, Gossage
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-31-2006, 06:23 PM
LionelHutz00 LionelHutz00 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,662
Default Re: 2007 MLB HOF Voting Poll

[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, what's with the no love for the career saves leader?

NT

[/ QUOTE ]

He wasn't very good.



What's with big swings in the number of votes that players get? In Sutter's first year of eligibility, he got 23.9% of the vote. Last year he got 76.9% to get elected. Is this difference because of turnover in voters? Or did half of the baseball writers change their minds on him?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-31-2006, 06:32 PM
crockpot crockpot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: /goggles fill up with tears / oh crap hold on can\'t see anything
Posts: 4,980
Default Re: 2007 MLB HOF Voting Poll

[ QUOTE ]
Here's my ballot:

1. Cal Ripken, Jr.
2. Tony Gwynn
3. Goose Gossage - no reason Sutter should be in and him not.
4. Alan Trammell - it's a travesty he and Whitaker won't be ale to go in together
5. Bert Blyleven - It's a joke that he's not in
6. Mark McGwire - controversial pick...

[/ QUOTE ]

same.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-31-2006, 06:35 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: 2007 MLB HOF Voting Poll

Alan Trammell is getting less love than Jim Rice, Lee Smith, Don Mattingly, and Orel [censored] Hershiser for god's sake. That's horrible.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-31-2006, 06:44 PM
Wynton Wynton is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: coping with the apokerlypse
Posts: 5,123
Default Re: 2007 MLB HOF Voting Poll

[ QUOTE ]
Alan Trammell is getting less love than Jim Rice, Lee Smith, Don Mattingly, and Orel [censored] Hershiser for god's sake. That's horrible.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think that has to do with playing on lower profile teams in smaller markets.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-31-2006, 07:05 PM
MaxxDaddy MaxxDaddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 564
Default Re: 2007 MLB HOF Voting Poll

[ QUOTE ]
Alan Trammell is getting less love than Jim Rice, Lee Smith, Don Mattingly, and Orel [censored] Hershiser for god's sake. That's horrible.

[/ QUOTE ]

In terms of hitting, Rice and Mattingly were better than Trammell in practically every aspect except for stolen bases. On defense, Trammell certainly played more of a skill position, but to have defense as a consideration, he would need more than his 3 Gold Gloves.

Then again, as a die-hard Yankees fan who grew up near the end of Donnie Baseball's career, I want to see Mattingly in the Hall of Fame, though I'm sure that won't happen.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-31-2006, 07:36 PM
THAY3R THAY3R is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: The Great White Hope
Posts: 9,755
Default Re: 2007 MLB HOF Voting Poll

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Alan Trammell is getting less love than Jim Rice, Lee Smith, Don Mattingly, and Orel [censored] Hershiser for god's sake. That's horrible.

[/ QUOTE ]

In terms of hitting, Rice and Mattingly were better than Trammell in practically every aspect except for stolen bases. On defense, Trammell certainly played more of a skill position, but to have defense as a consideration, he would need more than his 3 Gold Gloves.



[/ QUOTE ]


????
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-31-2006, 09:27 PM
Josh W Josh W is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Definately Rediculous.
Posts: 2,571
Default Re: 2007 MLB HOF Voting Poll

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Alan Trammell is getting less love than Jim Rice, Lee Smith, Don Mattingly, and Orel [censored] Hershiser for god's sake. That's horrible.

[/ QUOTE ]

In terms of hitting, Rice and Mattingly were better than Trammell in practically every aspect except for stolen bases. On defense, Trammell certainly played more of a skill position, but to have defense as a consideration, he would need more than his 3 Gold Gloves.

Then again, as a die-hard Yankees fan who grew up near the end of Donnie Baseball's career, I want to see Mattingly in the Hall of Fame, though I'm sure that won't happen.

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe it isn't fair to compare offensive production of a corner OFer or a 1B with a SS.

Josh
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.