Newhizzle v. Joe Cassidy 500/1k HU match - Page 4

shaniac · #31 05-30-2007, 03:57 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Newhizzle should learn to hit and run.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, but it's not in his nature. These guys love the epic headsup sessions, and I kind of enjoy them too.

ucnoles · #32 05-30-2007, 03:57 PM

Well I take back what I said before. He is down from when I was watching, but I am very happy to hear he is taking it to Joe. And he's not allowed to play for any less than 5 hours against Joe, because then Joe would bitch and moan about him hitting and running (speaking from experience). Good job Mark.

shaniac · #33 05-30-2007, 04:02 PM

ucnoles,

who are you and why do you dislike/hold a grudge against Joe? just curious.

ucnoles · #34 05-30-2007, 04:07 PM

I use to play Joe under 'go_seminoles'. I hold grudges because Joe and Dustin did nothing but give me [censored]. On a side note, Mark on a nice little run.

selurah · #35 05-30-2007, 04:10 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Newhizzle should learn to hit and run.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was thinking this a little while ago when Cassidy was really steamrolling, but now I check back in and whizzle is taking it to him again.

shaniac · #36 05-30-2007, 04:12 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I use to play Joe under 'go_seminoles'. I hold grudges because Joe and Dustin did nothing but give me [censored]. On a side note, Mark on a nice little run.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think high-stakes headsup limit/sh players have more pride than any other species of poker player.

JJoseph · #37 05-30-2007, 04:16 PM

[ QUOTE ]
PokerStars Game #10184772587: Hold'em Limit ($500/$1000) - 2007/05/30 - 14:54:30 (ET)
Table 'Buda' 10-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 3: newhizzle ($130306 in chips)
Seat 4: BUTCH ACIDY ($156600 in chips)
newhizzle: posts small blind $250
BUTCH ACIDY: posts big blind $500
*** HOLE CARDS ***
newhizzle: raises $500 to $1000
BUTCH ACIDY: raises $500 to $1500
newhizzle: calls $500
*** FLOP *** [Js Ks Ac]
BUTCH ACIDY: bets $500
newhizzle: calls $500
*** TURN *** [Js Ks Ac] [Ah]
BUTCH ACIDY: checks
newhizzle: bets $1000
BUTCH ACIDY: raises $1000 to $2000
newhizzle: calls $1000
*** RIVER *** [Js Ks Ac Ah] [9h]
BUTCH ACIDY: checks
newhizzle: checks
*** SHOW DOWN ***
BUTCH ACIDY: shows [Jh Jd] (a full house, Jacks full of Aces)
newhizzle: mucks hand
BUTCH ACIDY collected $7998 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $8000 | Rake $2
Board [Js Ks Ac Ah 9h]
Seat 3: newhizzle (button) (small blind) mucked
Seat 4: BUTCH ACIDY (big blind) showed [Jh Jd] and won ($7998) with a full house, Jacks full of Aces

Can someone explain the river check? I doubt is Mark more likely to bet and call a check-raise than to pay off a value bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Jennifer Tilly took temporary control of his body.

Ansky · #38 05-30-2007, 04:20 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I use to play Joe under 'go_seminoles'. I hold grudges because Joe and Dustin did nothing but give me [censored]. On a side note, Mark on a nice little run.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think high-stakes headsup limit/sh players have more pride than any other species of poker player.

[/ QUOTE ]

Was thinking the same thing... there seem to be very few of them, and they all seem to hate eachother.

danzasmack · #39 05-30-2007, 04:21 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
PokerStars Game #10184772587: Hold'em Limit ($500/$1000) - 2007/05/30 - 14:54:30 (ET)
Table 'Buda' 10-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 3: newhizzle ($130306 in chips)
Seat 4: BUTCH ACIDY ($156600 in chips)
newhizzle: posts small blind $250
BUTCH ACIDY: posts big blind $500
*** HOLE CARDS ***
newhizzle: raises $500 to $1000
BUTCH ACIDY: raises $500 to $1500
newhizzle: calls $500
*** FLOP *** [Js Ks Ac]
BUTCH ACIDY: bets $500
newhizzle: calls $500
*** TURN *** [Js Ks Ac] [Ah]
BUTCH ACIDY: checks
newhizzle: bets $1000
BUTCH ACIDY: raises $1000 to $2000
newhizzle: calls $1000
*** RIVER *** [Js Ks Ac Ah] [9h]
BUTCH ACIDY: checks
newhizzle: checks
*** SHOW DOWN ***
BUTCH ACIDY: shows [Jh Jd] (a full house, Jacks full of Aces)
newhizzle: mucks hand
BUTCH ACIDY collected $7998 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $8000 | Rake $2
Board [Js Ks Ac Ah 9h]
Seat 3: newhizzle (button) (small blind) mucked
Seat 4: BUTCH ACIDY (big blind) showed [Jh Jd] and won ($7998) with a full house, Jacks full of Aces

Can someone explain the river check? I doubt is Mark more likely to bet and call a check-raise than to pay off a value bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Jennifer Tilly took temporary control of his body.

[/ QUOTE ]

no. he was OOP and going for c/r

ucnoles · #40 05-30-2007, 04:27 PM

I like the Jennifer Tilly comment. The second comment was stupid. Why do you think he could have got another C/R out of him? A lot of things out there could have still beat him. After the C/R on the turn, he def should have just bet out into him on the river. If he gets raised, then he loses 2 bets. If he gets called with a worse hand, he wins 1 bet. If he checks, mark will probably only bet a made hand with that board, and maybe reraise him if he had a hand like A9. Either way, bad play by Joe. However, people did the same thing to me when I was playing HU for long sessions. They pick 1 random hand out of the session and critize the play. You can't play the same each hand and you have to be able to judge your opponents betting patterns. I haven't watched enough of the match, but if Joe thought he really could get Mark to bet the river then pay off a raise with a worse hand, then it wasn't THAT bad of a move.