|
|
#11
09-26-2007, 04:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL100 -
3 bet the flop. there are too many scary turn cards that kill your hand. the river bet is pretty thin, i would probably just check behind because i don't see much value betting cause you are getting called when you are beat most of the time.
|
|
#13
09-26-2007, 05:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 -
3-bet flop + c/b turn...?!
So you raise to protect from draws and then give a freecard? I dont rly see a point in that because I should expect to get called a lot if he has a draw here. If I am wrong pls tell me. Did you mean the hand reeks of FD if I 3-bet flop or as played? =)
|
|
#14
09-26-2007, 05:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 -
given read and possible KT, i don't think 3 betting flop is the best.... if you get a better read, yeah, but right now, you have no reason to think he's light, and a cr is pretty strong
calling turn is thin, there's quite a few more 2 pair possibilities that now hit, and combo FD+SDs hit, etc..... but i think calling is fine on the river, i really don't think you're ever going to be ahead if he calls... i guess sometimes he'll have KQ, but cring the flop w/ that is strange.... though the turn follow through w/ the picked up oesd matches... so overall, i like how you played this, but i think you should check river behind...... your bet is super thin, and he will most often fold to it, so you won't know what he had.... whereas if you check behind you'll get to see what he did this line w/
|
|
#17
09-26-2007, 05:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 -
i think alot of the advice here is too passive considering how many draws are on the flop...charge him on the flop...if a non scare card comes charge him again...if it looks like draw hits turn then check behind and call a reasonable river bet
there is no reason why we need to put him on a set or KT automatically because he check raised...TONS of people crai their draws
|
|
#19
09-26-2007, 05:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 -
I bet so much that I can expect to be called by a worse hand.
I dont think that he would c/r this river because the bet is so tiny. I'm in position so why should I bet if I dont bet for value? Either I bet for value and call or I fold. So I think he would only call here. btw, do you think he would call with 2pair here?
|
|
#20
09-26-2007, 05:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NL100 -
[ QUOTE ]
I bet so much that I can expect to be called by a worse hand. I dont think that he would c/r this river because the bet is so tiny. I'm in position so why should I bet if I dont bet for value? Either I bet for value and call or I fold. So I think he would only call here. [/ QUOTE ] it's very obvious you have a hand that you think has value in it, but not much.... so he can safely say you do not have a flush, and from turn play on the 2 tone board you don't have a str8.... so you have a 1 pair or 2 pair hand which you will fold to a raise.... so he can cr you off your hand if he know he can't win at show down....... he may also decide to cr you w/ hands that beat you (this won't be because of your bet size obv.) but basically you have to fold the river to a cr and you have no idea whether you just got bluffed or vbet due to your bet size which obviously cannot take heat
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
