Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Gambling > Sports Betting
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 11-18-2007, 04:21 PM
pirateboy pirateboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,514
Default Re: Pirateboy\'s NCAAF ML Dogs Experiment - W9

Great week finally. 7-6 +13u

YTD 27-49 +.9u
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 11-19-2007, 03:49 PM
knicknut knicknut is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stewie\'s sexy parties
Posts: 945
Default Re: Pirateboy\'s NCAAF ML Dogs Experiment - W9

[ QUOTE ]
Great week finally. 7-6 +13u

YTD 27-49 +.9u

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm curious if you have a comment to refute my last point. Are you considering something that I did not include in my analysis?
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 11-19-2007, 06:47 PM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: Pirateboy\'s NCAAF ML Dogs Experiment - W9

pirateboy, are you betting a straight unit across the board, or is this kelly, or what?
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 11-19-2007, 07:12 PM
pirateboy pirateboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,514
Default Re: Pirateboy\'s NCAAF ML Dogs Experiment - W9

Straight across the board, and yes, I know I should probably kelly.

knicknut, I like what you had to say, but I really don't think there is that big of a standard deviation amongst each team at each half point.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 11-19-2007, 09:43 PM
knicknut knicknut is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Stewie\'s sexy parties
Posts: 945
Default Re: Pirateboy\'s NCAAF ML Dogs Experiment - W9

I don't quite understand what you mean... are you saying the difference in standard deviations can't be that big?

My question is then how do you account for why sportsbooks make different moneylines for different spreads? Why not just link them one to one? There must be something they're taking into account (that you're not).

Also, have you backtested the strategy with out of sample trials to refute it? OK, X point favorites won Y percent of the time, but do X point favorites with moneylines above the breakeven (that you are willing to bet) still win at least Y percent of the time?

If this is just your gut feeling and you're having fun with it, fine. I still don't think this is +EV as a rote strategy, though, as you're just betting against adjustments the books make (modifying the ML for games of the same spread). You're pretty much making a punt that they're doing it in the wrong direction.

Good luck.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 11-23-2007, 03:09 PM
pirateboy pirateboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,514
Default Re: Pirateboy\'s NCAAF ML Dogs Experiment - W9

Missed the earliest games (Wyo/CSU, Miss St/Ole Miss, Neb/Col) due to work. But, 2 plays so far:

Wyoming +150 (need +127)
Texas A&M +235 (need +230)

Boise will probably be a play, but playing it closer to gametime.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 11-24-2007, 12:18 PM
pirateboy pirateboy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,514
Default Re: Pirateboy\'s NCAAF ML Dogs Experiment - W9

Saturday:

Maryland +110 (need +107)
Tennessee +130 (need +121)
Utah +170 (need +153)
Alabama +175 (need +153)
Georgia Tech +155 (need +150)
Utah State +120 (need +116)
SJSU +145 (need +142)
Virginia +140 (need +135)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.