|
View Poll Results: Pitt (college, not our beloved Steelers) @ Cinncinnati | |||
PItt -8.5 | 4 | 57.14% | |
Cincy +8.5 | 1 | 14.29% | |
I'll be watching porn on my new flat screen TV that Mansion bought me | 2 | 28.57% | |
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which Is Worse
[ QUOTE ]
"homosexuality is a far more subtle display of survival of the fittest. chez " I don't know if anyone has ever explained to you how the birds and the bees work... [/ QUOTE ] I've got the idea and yet homosexuality has survived so well, hence it is very fit. chez |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which Is Worse
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Animals fighting animals survival of the fittest at work [/ QUOTE ] homosexuality is a far more subtle display of survival of the fittest. chez [/ QUOTE ] Since, surival of the fittest is about stay alive and procreating... Are you suggesting that since homosexual acts are not procreating they are inferior to hetersexual behavior? [/ QUOTE ] No I'm not suggesting that at all. chez [/ QUOTE ] What are you suggesting then? [/ QUOTE ] That if you like displays of fit things surviving, you should watch the homosexuals. chez |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which Is Worse
[ QUOTE ]
I've got the idea and yet homosexuality has survived so well, hence it is very fit. [/ QUOTE ] How is homosexuality selected for or how is this trait passed on from one generation to the next? |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which Is Worse
As for the O.P. obviously the gay sex is worse. How is this even a question? Dog fights are awesome.
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which Is Worse
dogfighting is worse.... but would interest me more to see that than to see livegaysex.
i must be eeeeevvvvviiiil EDIT: unless they are lipstick lesbians. livelipsticklesbiansex FTW. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which Is Worse
[ QUOTE ]
As for the O.P. obviously the gay sex is worse. How is this even a question? Dog fights are awesome. [/ QUOTE ] And earlier someone took the other side and also said "how is this even a question". That's when I know I am doing my job. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which Is Worse
The dogs are acting on instinct. There is no free choice for the dogs and thus all actions are natural. We can't make a moral judgment about the dogs.
The men on the other hand have the ability to make a rational choice, and any action they choose will thus have ethical implications. They will either be doing something good or bad. We must make a judgment in their regard, and men sodomizing each other is a grave ethical disorder. It is morally repugnant in and of itself and scandalous. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which Is Worse
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I've got the idea and yet homosexuality has survived so well, hence it is very fit. [/ QUOTE ] How is homosexuality selected for or how is this trait passed on from one generation to the next? [/ QUOTE ] Its a tough question which is why anyone interested in survival of the fittest should be more interested in homosexuality than in dogfights. chez |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which Is Worse
[ QUOTE ]
The dogs are acting on instinct. There is no free choice for the dogs and thus all actions are natural. We can't make a moral judgment about the dogs. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think that's the crux of the question. Dog fights are normally considered bad because of the cruel tactics used to breed these dogs, and the ways they are "disposed of." By attending a fight you're supporting that cruelty. The actual fighting that goes on really isn't what most people have a problem with. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which Is Worse
the question is about staging the events, not participating in them.
|
|
|