#1
|
|||
|
|||
SCOTUS Decision: Garcetti v. Ceballos
Good blog discussion of this case
Anybody else following this case? IMO a terrible and somewhat scary decision by the majority. Ceballos worked for a prosecutors office and wrote an internal memo suggesting a possibility of illegal behavior in obtaining a search warrant. Ceballos was then re-assigned to a less desirable position apparently in retaliation for the memo. Ceballos claimed his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated. The Supreme Court ruled that speech relating to a gov't employee's job is not protected. The only way it could possibly be protected is if Ceballos wrote a letter to the editor or maybe posted on a personal blog about his opinions. As far as I can tell the decision does everything to promote gov't corruption and nothing much to promote transparent gov't. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SCOTUS Decision: Garcetti v. Ceballos
That's the beauty of the Supreme Court. They don't decide on what would have the best results. They rule based on what the law says.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SCOTUS Decision: Garcetti v. Ceballos
[ QUOTE ]
That's the beauty of the Supreme Court. They don't decide on what would have the best results. They rule based on what the law says. [/ QUOTE ] Uhhh.... not even close to a true statement. At least read the syllabus to the case before posting moronic generalizations. The majority opinion clearly made a ruling they believed would lead to the "best results". |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SCOTUS Decision: Garcetti v. Ceballos
Cedric should've stuck to his "blindfolded" dunks.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: SCOTUS Decision: Garcetti v. Ceballos
Alito is a stooge for big brother and big govt. No question about it. His decisions have been terrible so far an dthis one is no exception. I don't see it getting any better down the road.
natedogg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|