|
|
#1
05-02-2007, 05:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Is Party full ring now tighter than Stars?
I was given a long time no see bonus and I couldn't believe how rock like the full ring NL games are above the donk nano stakes. Anybody play both these days? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/ooo.gif[/img]
|
|
#2
05-03-2007, 01:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Party full ring now tighter than Stars?
Bump....... [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
|
|
#4
05-03-2007, 04:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Party full ring now tighter than Stars?
Yep, the FR games are beyond brutal. I play the 200's there and on avg the table vpip is 14-17. There are usually 9 regulars per table and they are all multitabling just about every table. Also there are tons of the shortstack germans on every table.
|
|
#5
05-03-2007, 05:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Party full ring now tighter than Stars?
[ QUOTE ]
Yep, the FR games are beyond brutal. I play the 200's there and on avg the table vpip is 14-17. There are usually 9 regulars per table and they are all multitabling just about every table. Also there are tons of the shortstack germans on every table. [/ QUOTE ] I have been play 200NL there since last October, but now I swicht to UB, games are much better.
|
|
#6
05-03-2007, 07:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Party full ring now tighter than Stars?
Why wouldn't you just play 6 max? It's so much better...
|
|
#7
05-03-2007, 08:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Is Party full ring now tighter than Stars?
I know it's a total cliche on 2+2, and I normally disagree with people who arrogantly say this, but you can just runover these nits by playing a gear faster than they are.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
