|
|
#11
03-22-2007, 11:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Jman vs Ram monster session (low content)
[ QUOTE ]
At least you all would've gone broke. Guess my hand? [/ QUOTE ] ZOMG, runner-runner... Worst beat evah! 
|
|
#12
03-22-2007, 11:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jman vs Ram monster session (low content)
[ QUOTE ]
I wanted to say 99 but that would be a weird way to have played top set on that board no? [/ QUOTE ] He said it was his worst beat ever, so its obviously 68 Edit: And he never raised
|
|
#14
03-22-2007, 11:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jman vs Ram monster session (low content)
I also think it has to be 68.
|
|
#15
03-22-2007, 11:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jman vs Ram monster session (low content)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I wanted to say 99 but that would be a weird way to have played top set on that board no? [/ QUOTE ] He said it was his worst beat ever, so its obviously 68 [/ QUOTE ] Im sorry.
|
|
#16
03-22-2007, 11:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jman vs Ram monster session (low content)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I wanted to say 99 but that would be a weird way to have played top set on that board no? [/ QUOTE ] He said it was his worst beat ever, so its obviously 68 [/ QUOTE ] Im sorry. [/ QUOTE ] However, if it is 99 and he is crying about it, LOL and if it is 6-8 and he is crying about it, LOL and if its anything else and he is crying about it, LOL and when he said "Atleast you all would've gone broke" thats only true because I dont have $75,000 to play poker with. I guarantee you that in that same situation (With the same amount of money) a lot of 2+2'rs dont go broke there, even with 99 Edit: I mean they wont go broke on the river. They may actually get all-in on the flop or turn (While they are ahead) and then lose it all when they get rivered. I guess that could be what you meant Edit again to say, you had him covered, so no one is going broke there.
|
|
#18
03-22-2007, 11:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jman vs Ram monster session (low content)
He mentioned that he took a beat as 95% fav., he's not crying...ur a [censored] loser
|
|
#19
03-22-2007, 11:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jman vs Ram monster session (low content)
Final tally?
BTW - Time to change the name to Sanjaya?
|
|
#20
03-22-2007, 11:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jman vs Ram monster session (low content)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I wanted to say 99 but that would be a weird way to have played top set on that board no? [/ QUOTE ] He said it was his worst beat ever, so its obviously 68 [/ QUOTE ] Im sorry. [/ QUOTE ] However, if it is 99 and he is crying about it, LOL and if it is 6-8 and he is crying about it, LOL and if its anything else and he is crying about it, LOL and when he said "Atleast you all would've gone broke" thats only true because I dont have $75,000 to play poker with. I guarantee you that in that same situation (With the same amount of money) a lot of 2+2'rs dont go broke there, even with 99 Edit: I mean they wont go broke on the river. They may actually get all-in on the flop or turn (While they are ahead) and then lose it all when they get rivered. I guess that could be what you meant Edit again to say, you had him covered, so no one is going broke there. [/ QUOTE ] Are you retarded anyone who wouldn't instashove 99 on that river is terrible.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
