Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-03-2007, 05:52 PM
Kaj Kaj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bet-the-pot
Posts: 1,812
Default Gen (ret.) Barry McCaffrey\'s assessment of Iraq

These are the facts.

Iraq is ripped by a low grade civil war which has worsened to catastrophic levels with as many as 3000 citizens murdered per month. The population is in despair. Life in many of the urban areas is now desperate. A handful of foreign fighters (500+) --- and a couple of thousand Al Qaeda operatives incite open factional struggle through suicide bombings which target Shia holy places and innocent civilians. Thousands of attacks target US Military Forces (2900 IED’s) a month---primarily stand off attacks with IED’s, rockets, mortars, snipers, and mines from both Shia (EFP attacks are a primary casualty producer) ---and Sunni (85% of all attacks---80% of US deaths—16% of Iraqi population.)

Three million Iraqis are internally displaced or have fled the country to Syria and Jordan. The technical and educated elites are going into self-imposed exile---a huge brain drain that imperils the ability to govern. The Maliki government has little credibility among the Shia populations from which it emerged. It is despised by the Sunni as a Persian surrogate. It is believed untrustworthy and incompetent by the Kurds.

There is no function of government that operates effectively across the nation--- not health care, not justice, not education, not transportation, not labor and commerce, not electricity, not oil production. There is no province in the country in which the government has dominance. The government cannot spend its own money effectively. ($7.1 billion sits in New York banks.) No Iraqi government official, coalition soldier, diplomat, reporter, foreign NGO, nor contractor can walk the streets of Baghdad, nor Mosul, nor Kirkuk, nor Basra, nor Tikrit, nor Najaf, nor Ramadi---without heavily armed protection.

The police force is feared as a Shia militia in uniform which is responsible for thousands of extra-judicial killings. There is no effective nation-wide court system. There are in general almost no acceptable Iraqi penal institutions. The population is terrorized by rampant criminal gangs involved in kidnapping, extortion, robbery, rape, massive stealing of public property ---such as electrical lines, oil production material, government transportation, etc. (Saddam released 80,000 criminal prisoners.)

The Iraqi Army is too small, very badly equipped (inadequate light armor, junk Soviet small arms, no artillery, no helicopters to speak of, currently no actual or planned ground attack aircraft of significance, no significant air transport assets (only three C-130’s), no national military logistics system, no national military medical system, etc. The Iraqi Army is also unduly dominated by the Shia, and in many battalions lacks discipline. There is no legal authority to punish Iraqi soldiers or police who desert their comrades. (The desertion/AWOL numbers frequently leave Iraqi Army battalions at 50% strength or less.)

In total, enemy insurgents or armed sectarian militias (SCIRI, JAM, Pesh Merga, AQI, 1920’s Brigade, et. al.) probably exceed 100,000 armed fighters. These non-government armed bands are in some ways more capable of independent operations than the regularly constituted ISF. They do not depend fundamentally on foreign support for their operations. Most of their money, explosives, and leadership are generated inside Iraq. The majority of the Iraqi population (Sunni and Shia) support armed attacks on American forces. Although we have arrested 120,000 insurgents (hold 27,000) and killed some huge number of enemy combatants (perhaps 20,000+) --- the armed insurgents, militias, and Al Qaeda in Iraq without fail apparently re-generate both leadership cadres and foot soldiers. Their sophistication, numbers, and lethality go up--- not down--- as they incur these staggering battle losses.

US domestic support for the war in Iraq has evaporated and will not return. The great majority of the country thinks the war was a mistake. The US Congress now has a central focus on constraining the Administration use of military power in Iraq ---and potentially Iran. The losses of US Army, Marine, and Special Operations Force casualties in Iraq now exceed 27,000 killed and wounded. (Note: The Iraqi Security Forces have suffered more than 49,000 casualties in the last 14 months.) The war costs $9 Billion per month. Stateside US Army and Marine Corps readiness ratings are starting to unravel. Ground combat equipment is shot in both the active and reserve components. Army active and reserve component recruiting has now encountered serious quality and number problems. In many cases we are forced to use US contractors to substitute for required military functions. (128,000 contractors in Iraq---includes more than 2000 armed security personnel.) Waivers in US Army recruiting standards for: moral turpitude, drug use, medical issues, criminal justice records, and non-high school graduation have gone up significantly. We now are enlisting 42 year old first term soldiers. Our promotion rates for officers and NCOs have skyrocketed to replace departing leaders. There is no longer a national or a theater US Army strategic reserve. (Fortunately, powerful US Naval, Air Force, and nuclear capabilities command huge deterrence credibility.)

We are at the “knee of the curve.” Two million+ troops of the smallest active Army force since WWII have served in the war zone. Some active units have served three, four, or even five combat deployments. We are now routinely extending nearly all combat units in both Iraq and Afghanistan. These combat units are being returned to action in some cases with only 7-12 months of stateside time to re-train and re-equip. The current deployment requirement of 20+ brigades to Iraq and 2+ brigades in Afghanistan is not sustainable.

We will be forced to call up as many as nine National Guard combat brigades for an involuntary second combat tour this coming year. (Dr Chu at DOD has termed this as “no big deal.”) Many believe that this second round of involuntary call-ups will topple the weakened National Guard structure--- which is so central to US domestic security. The National Guard Bureau has argued for a call up of only 12 months instead of 18 months. This misses the point—DOD will without fail be forced to also extend these National Guard brigades in combat at the last minute given the continuation of the current emergency situation.

Iraq’s neighbors are a problem--- not part of the solution (with the exception of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait). They provide little positive political or economic support to the Maliki government.

Our allies are leaving to include the courageous and well equipped Brit’s—by January 2008 we will be largely on our own.

In summary, the US Armed Forces are in a position of strategic peril. A disaster in Iraq will in all likelihood result in a widened regional struggle which will endanger America’s strategic interests (oil) in the Mid-east for a generation. We will also produce another generation of soldiers who lack confidence in their American politicians, the media, and their own senior military leadership.

========================
In all fairness, he did also assess the situation as improving since Gen Petraeus took over. His conclusion:

6. SUMMARY:
We have brilliant military and civilian leadership on the ground in Iraq. General Dave Petraeus, LTG Ray Odierno, and Ambassador Ryan Crocker have the country’s treasure and combat power at their disposal. Our cause is just. The consequence of failure will be severe.

The American people hold that the US Armed Forces are the most trusted institution in our society. The polls also show that domestic opinion is not calling for precipitous withdrawal. However, this whole Iraq operation is on the edge of unraveling as the poor Iraqis batter each other to death with our forces caught in the middle.

We now need a last powerful effort to provide to US leaders on the ground ---the political support, economic reconstruction resources, and military strength it requires to succeed.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-03-2007, 06:14 PM
MoreWineII MoreWineII is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: 5% chance at Greg Oden
Posts: 4,863
Default Re: Gen (ret.) Barry McCaffrey\'s assessment of Iraq

This: [ QUOTE ]
this whole Iraq operation is on the edge of unraveling as the poor Iraqis batter each other to death with our forces caught in the middle.

[/ QUOTE ]

is more likely than this:

[ QUOTE ]
We now need a last powerful effort to provide to US leaders on the ground ---the political support, economic reconstruction resources, and military strength it requires to succeed.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-03-2007, 06:26 PM
Kaj Kaj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bet-the-pot
Posts: 1,812
Default Re: Gen (ret.) Barry McCaffrey\'s assessment of Iraq

[ QUOTE ]
This: [ QUOTE ]
this whole Iraq operation is on the edge of unraveling as the poor Iraqis batter each other to death with our forces caught in the middle.

[/ QUOTE ]

is more likely than this:

[ QUOTE ]
We now need a last powerful effort to provide to US leaders on the ground ---the political support, economic reconstruction resources, and military strength it requires to succeed.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Concur.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-04-2007, 10:28 AM
GtrHtr GtrHtr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,729
Default Re: Gen (ret.) Barry McCaffrey\'s assessment of Iraq

Gen McCaffrey is pretty much dead on.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-04-2007, 12:20 PM
NewTeaBag NewTeaBag is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Phuket, Thailand
Posts: 2,085
Default Re: Gen (ret.) Barry McCaffrey\'s assessment of Iraq

The General's Assessment of the situation seems accurate beyond argument. His summary is a bit confusing though in that it is hard to read the assessment and logicly follow through to a conclusion that yet another final push should be made. I don't see how this push would change the situation.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-04-2007, 12:59 PM
sam h sam h is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,994
Default Re: Gen (ret.) Barry McCaffrey\'s assessment of Iraq

[ QUOTE ]
Gen McCaffrey is an [censored] and probably a war criminal but pretty much dead on in this case.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-04-2007, 01:52 PM
Case Closed Case Closed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: just how dangerous is it for a pot to hold ice?
Posts: 7,298
Default Re: Gen (ret.) Barry McCaffrey\'s assessment of Iraq

Is there a link to this?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-04-2007, 02:08 PM
GtrHtr GtrHtr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,729
Default Re: Gen (ret.) Barry McCaffrey\'s assessment of Iraq

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Gen McCaffrey is an [censored] and probably a war criminal but pretty much dead on in this case.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

War criminal? wtf are you talking about? Be specific please.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-04-2007, 02:56 PM
sam h sam h is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,994
Default Re: Gen (ret.) Barry McCaffrey\'s assessment of Iraq

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Gen McCaffrey is an [censored] and probably a war criminal but pretty much dead on in this case.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

War criminal? wtf are you talking about? Be specific please.

[/ QUOTE ]

There have been allegations that he engaged in rogue actions during Gulf War I that involved moving his troops, unauthorized, into a position inside Iraq that was in the path of retreating Iraqi forces (which were mixed up with large groups of fleeing civilians) and then slaughtering them in basically a one-way firefight.

I used the word "probably" because the facts are highly disputed.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-04-2007, 03:00 PM
Case Closed Case Closed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: just how dangerous is it for a pot to hold ice?
Posts: 7,298
Default Re: Gen (ret.) Barry McCaffrey\'s assessment of Iraq

http://www.michaelyon-online.com/wp/...affrey-ret.htm
Incase anyone is interested in a link.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.