|
|
#1
03-07-2007, 01:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
AK hand played against a 2+2er (LIMCASH)
Since WPX hand histories suck, I can't make them a word document without a lot of work (lol documents) and there is no converter for WPX I'm just going to post this hand by itself.
He knows who I am; I know who he is. He's played well so far and hasn't gotten out of line at all. His preflop range seems about right (he'll threebet legit hands and throw in some others). Never calls OTB, ect. He seems to play the big streets especially well. If he's making any errors, he is not putting in that extra bet once in a while. I'm running really well and have him stuck about a buy in. Because of this, he might think I'm slightly laggier than your normal good 1/2 HU player (which is probably true). Anyway the hand: He raises OTB. I 3-bet A [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]K [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Flop: 8 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 2 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] I bet. He calls. Turn: T [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Bet. Call. River: K [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] I Bet. He raises. I threebet. He four-bets. I fold. Final pot was 13 BB. 
|
|
#2
03-07-2007, 01:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AK hand played against a 2+2er (LIMCASH)
I don't specialize in limit, and I understand your thinking here that he is definitely not bluffing, but are you sure he isn't going to make this move with AK or a slightly worse K? But given the read that he is completely straightforward or whatever, I guess this is fine. I dunno, 90% of my HU play is NL, so I'm a donk here and call for the odds. He really can't be chasing with overs here and just tied you or hit KQ? He's a different kind of LHE player than most I have played then.
btw I think the final pot is actually 7 BBs isn't it? Maybe it was 14 small bets, minus one for rake? Oh or wait nm, you mean 14 big blinds, I was thinking BB=big bet. p.s. bonus points for how you played the hand if you just folded air here but posted that you had AK knowing he'll see this and start trying to checkraise you off TPTK on every river.
|
|
#3
03-07-2007, 01:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AK hand played against a 2+2er (LIMCASH)
this hand seems all [censored] up.
are you BB? if so why is he checking the flop, etc? if your question is: should you bet/fold TPTK on this river, i don't think i like it. maybe there's something i don't see or the order makes sense or something but i dunno. bbbushu
|
|
#4
03-07-2007, 01:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AK hand played against a 2+2er (LIMCASH)
[ QUOTE ]
btw I think the final pot is actually 7 BBs isn't it? Maybe it was 14 small bets, minus one for rake? Oh or wait nm, you mean 14 big blinds, I was thinking BB=big bet. [/ QUOTE ] he put in 5 BB plus my 4 BB plus 4 BB total between us preflop and postflop.
|
|
#5
03-07-2007, 01:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AK hand played against a 2+2er (LIMCASH)
[ QUOTE ]
this hand seems all [censored] up. are you BB? if so why is he checking the flop, etc? if your question is: should you bet/fold TPTK on this river, i don't think i like it. maybe there's something i don't see or the order makes sense or something but i dunno. bbbushu [/ QUOTE ] Your right. Fixed.
|
|
#6
03-07-2007, 02:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AK hand played against a 2+2er (LIMCASH)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] btw I think the final pot is actually 7 BBs isn't it? Maybe it was 14 small bets, minus one for rake? Oh or wait nm, you mean 14 big blinds, I was thinking BB=big bet. [/ QUOTE ] he put in 5 BB plus my 4 BB plus 4 BB total between us preflop and postflop. [/ QUOTE ] Hmm yeah, I dunno, I guess I read the HH before you fixed it, it seems different now, I'm too confused to read it another few times and figure it out haha. But also I don't think my previous comments really stand, because I don't think you had him 4-betting the river in the OP, and my comments were based on him just checkraising you on the river. So ignore my post.
|
|
#7
03-07-2007, 02:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AK hand played against a 2+2er (LIMCASH)
jjh,
i'd rather check/raise this river and just call a three-bet. if you're going to bet, i don't three-bet because i'd hate to fold TPTK here [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#8
03-07-2007, 02:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AK hand played against a 2+2er (LIMCASH)
[ QUOTE ]
jjh, i'd rather check/raise this river and just call a three-bet. if you're going to bet, i don't three-bet because i'd hate to fold TPTK here [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I'm not expecting him to bet when I check to him very often on this particular river. If he was more aggressive, I'd like check/raise/calling a lot more. Do you like b/c or c/r more? Oh yeah, I'm an effing idiot regarding hand histories. Don't know how I effed that one up so bad.
|
|
#9
03-07-2007, 03:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AK hand played against a 2+2er (LIMCASH)
if he's not aggressive enough to bet this river when checked to, i really don't want to three-bet.
i like bet/call then. we should play sometime [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] bbbushu
|
|
#10
03-07-2007, 03:34 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AK hand played against a 2+2er (LIMCASH)
[ QUOTE ]
if he's not aggressive enough to bet this river when checked to, i really don't want to three-bet. i like bet/call then. we should play sometime [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] bbbushu [/ QUOTE ] sure PM me.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
