|
|
#22
01-31-2007, 07:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should the state be allowed to force little girls............
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] They're gonna do what they want anyway. [/ QUOTE ] Not if the relevant government officials are held to their oaths of office. [/ QUOTE ] Something that hasn't been happening for over a century. Not with Congress anyway. 
|
|
#23
01-31-2007, 07:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Should the state be allowed to force little girls............
[ QUOTE ]
Merck & Co. is a corporation. Free market, Capitalists, etc. [/ QUOTE ] A corporation is a government created entity, making it anti-free market.
|
|
#24
01-31-2007, 08:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Should the state be allowed to force little girls............
[ QUOTE ]
Should the state be allowed to force little girls to get STD vacines? Link Stu [/ QUOTE ] Why does it matter if the disease is sexually transmitted?
|
|
#25
01-31-2007, 09:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Should the state be allowed to force little girls............
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, The vaccine actually works. Don't know what you guys are so uptight about????? Huh? [/ QUOTE ] Even without taking into account things like mercury and cancer causing viruses and contamination, the vaccine makers themselves admit that there can be side effects, and under law if a vaccinatee is injured they are prohibited from receiving just compensation via law. It's a cost/benefit thing. If you don't mind your child being injured a small percentage of the time (according to the drug industry) then no biggee.
|
|
#26
01-31-2007, 09:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Should the state be allowed to force little girls............
[ QUOTE ]
Quote: All vaccines voluntary in US. Certain vacines are mandatory if you wish your child to recieve a public education. Stu [/ QUOTE ] Total propaganda. In most states the parent can simply sign a waiver, in West Virginia and Louisiana I believe it's a simple judge ordered court procedure, similiar to a legal name change, no biggee. Assuming you even want your kid to go to public school. But notice how the article makes it seem like it's THE LAW that you must vaccinate your child. It's a sign of propaganda I think. Like a consensus reality propaganda, not saying the writers are deliberately deceiving people.
|
|
#27
01-31-2007, 09:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Should the state be allowed to force little girls............
[ QUOTE ]
Why does it matter if the disease is sexually transmitted? [/ QUOTE ] In a cost benefit analysis, if there's no benefit then there's only the cost. Having said that, if parents are dumb enough to vaccinate their children for every little thing, then their children probably will be promiscuous. I think the reality is that for most (dumb)people, this is a good thing.
|
|
#28
01-31-2007, 10:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Should the state be allowed to force little girls............
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Why does it matter if the disease is sexually transmitted? [/ QUOTE ] In a cost benefit analysis, if there's no benefit then there's only the cost. Having said that, if parents are dumb enough to vaccinate their children for every little thing, then their children probably will be promiscuous. I think the reality is that for most (dumb)people, this is a good thing. [/ QUOTE ] Well I think that a lot of people are making a big deal out of this being sexually transmitted. I think HPV is a pretty poor example because it's something that most people don't know about and is not going to impact people's sexual decsion making at all IMO. As far as only dumb people being for this I'm not sure I agree. I do agree that obv it all has do with cost/benefit, but cervical cancer affects a lot of women, and while the chance goes up if you are more promiscuous, I think that if even ifyou have 2-3 partners in your lifetime (depending on how promiscuous they are) you are up there as far as relative risk goes.
|
|
#29
02-01-2007, 05:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Should the state be allowed to force little girls............
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Should the state be allowed to force little girls to get STD vacines? Link Stu [/ QUOTE ] Why does it matter if the disease is sexually transmitted? [/ QUOTE ] Because if it is sexually transmitted, one can choose not to be exposed to it (or choose not to spread it); unlike, for example, a disease that may be caught by someone coughing in one's face.
|
|
#30
02-01-2007, 05:54 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Should the state be allowed to force little girls............
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Should the state be allowed to force little girls to get STD vacines? Link Stu [/ QUOTE ] Why does it matter if the disease is sexually transmitted? [/ QUOTE ] Because if it is sexually transmitted, one can choose not to be exposed to it (or choose not to spread it); unlike, for example, a disease that may be caught by someone coughing in one's face. [/ QUOTE ] LOL.. at what age can you make these decisions meaningfully, and what about circumstances when it is not your choice.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
