600 NL, big draw against floater.

[veryblind]

I think this is good, but not perfect.
I think you have enough FE here, but when I make plays like this with unmade hands, I like to be able to represent something. What hand would bet flop and check turn on this board (possibly giving free card to flush)?

I think if villain has shown himself to be very aggressive postflop, and his bet-when-checked-to is almost certain, then this is better.

Still, I think villain has shown some weakness. (Perhaps he wants a cheap showdown or trying to steal with a turn bet.) I think you can push him off the hand enough of the time plus your outs are probably live if he calls (don't think he's calling with bare flush draw, maybe KdXd)

I don't play this level so I don't really know what players think at this level. Just my 2 cents

[Grinding2Ecstasy]

[ QUOTE ]
I think this is good, but not perfect.
I think you have enough FE here, but when I make plays like this with unmade hands, I like to be able to represent something. What hand would bet flop and check turn on this board (possibly giving free card to flush)?


[/ QUOTE ]

You're imagining that this is a thinking opponent who is logically breaking down the action and assigning hand ranges. Its a 60 vpip float tard, so its about how much he likes his hand. He prob doesn't like it for $350 more than his puny probe bet, if he does we have prob 2 draws to crack him.

[SABR42]

[ QUOTE ]
I think this is good, but not perfect.
I think you have enough FE here, but when I make plays like this with unmade hands, I like to be able to represent something. What hand would bet flop and check turn on this board (possibly giving free card to flush)?

[/ QUOTE ]
Good point, but this villain probably won't think that far.

[Renton]

i think i'd have just betcalled like 124. I'm not sure i trust a donk to bet for me, and i'd rather the turn didn't go check check.

[TheProdigy]

uhhh..yea I call this easy.

You don't have much FE, and many crazy hands can hit him on the river(like your flush giving him a two pair). I see no reason to raise this