|
|
#11
11-22-2007, 01:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($16) Two all-in\'s before me, is this a call?
JJ is a call, TT is kind of close without looking.
Ranges above discussed are way off. More like 88+,AQ, and a lot of the time AA,KK are not shoved here. 99-QQ,AQ+ is a much more likely range readless. 
|
|
#12
11-22-2007, 01:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ($16) Two all-in\'s before me, is this a call?
[ QUOTE ]
JJ is a call, TT is kind of close without looking. Ranges above discussed are way off. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think these are the ranges they push. I stoved tight ranges. [ QUOTE ] More like 88+,AQ, and a lot of the time AA,KK are not shoved here. 99-QQ,AQ+ is a much more likely range readless. [/ QUOTE ] JJ does better against that range obv.
|
|
#13
11-22-2007, 02:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ($16) Two all-in\'s before me, is this a call?
I agree 100% with TruFloridaGator. I snapcall JJ, probably call AKs. AKo and TT could go either way depending on reads, I lean towards folding readless.
Btw, AK performs better than expected against very tight ranges mostly because of card removal effects halving the chance of running into AA/KK.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
