1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested

[poker345]

faster turbos ,lower rake.
or /hands not time.

[BHokie1]

Please keep the ante's, if you make a change replacing the 100/200 25 ante level with a 150/300 25 ante would be the change to make.

The rake on the 32+3 is too high, it would be nice to have a level to play between $27s and the $60s without such a high rake. There's not a serious multi-tabler that wants to play that level because of the rake.

[Pudge714]

BTW one more thing about rake if you were to make these threads in SSNL/MSNL/HSNL/MTT they would not ask to lower rake, they would ask for structure changes, stuff like synchronizing breaks in MTTs, adding more high stakes 6max games, etc. The fact STTF is asking for lower rake means that it is a serious problem effecting the long term profitability of a games and not just an easy way to save $1 a sng.

[CheeseMoney]

Rake paid for about 40-45 minutes of play time at a 32+3 is 81$ for the table (and less time for early busting). Can someone with a knowledge of rake at the cash games let me know at what cash stakes we'd have to be playing in order to pay that kind of rake in this amount of time?

[George Lind III]

If you really want to find a disparity try doing the same calculations for sngs with buyins over $500. How on earth is there any logical reason that the rake barely goes up at all in cash games whether you're playing 5/10 or 500/1000, yet the rake in sngs is 90 times higher in a 2k buyin than it is in a $15 buyin?

[Sparta45]

Keep the ante's....anything that adds to the overall skill of a sng is a good thing

[CheeseMoney]

Agreed, forgot rake was capped.

[Scotty_12]

[ QUOTE ]
If you really want to find a disparity try doing the same calculations for sngs with buyins over $500. How on earth is there any logical reason that the rake barely goes up at all in cash games whether you're playing 5/10 or 500/1000, yet the rake in sngs is 90 times higher in a 2k buyin than it is in a $15 buyin?

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT

[kkcountry]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If you really want to find a disparity try doing the same calculations for sngs with buyins over $500. How on earth is there any logical reason that the rake barely goes up at all in cash games whether you're playing 5/10 or 500/1000, yet the rake in sngs is 90 times higher in a 2k buyin than it is in a $15 buyin?

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT

[/ QUOTE ]

[DMMx69]

hands per level is good except for one problem: When the STT gets 3-way of heads-up, the blinds can quickly become massive as ten hands go by in no time at all. Maybe adjust so that when the table gets short handed you also get more hands at a given level than you do in the early rounds....