Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-11-2006, 11:41 AM
axioma axioma is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London, England.
Posts: 1,263
Default TPTK vs obvious 2 pair (600NL).

villain in this hand is pretty rocky, something like 17/6, and otherwise seems quite solid.


Party Poker ($6 no limit). Hand converted by Check Raised hand converter

Preflop (6 players): Hero is MP with K A
1 fold.
HERO raises $24.00.
1 fold.
BTN calls ($24.00).
SB calls ($21.00).
1 fold.

Flop (13 bets ($78) in pot, 3 players): Q K 3
SB checks.
HERO bets $62.00.
BTN calls ($62.00).
SB calls ($62.00).

Turn (44 bets ($264) in pot, 3 players): Q K 3 J
SB checks.
HERO checks.
BTN bets $222.00.
SB folds.
HERO...

it looks very much like we are behind, but we have outs. thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-11-2006, 11:53 AM
axioma axioma is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London, England.
Posts: 1,263
Default Re: TPTK vs obvious 2 pair (600NL).

ooops stack sizes didnt show up. he has 440 and i cover.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-11-2006, 02:43 PM
oakley77 oakley77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 270
Default Re: TPTK vs obvious 2 pair (600NL).

you're only getting around 2:1 pot odds, I wouldnt be counting outs in this situation and would fold here, bet less on flop too... around $50, horrible turn card that u can fold to since u dont beat much nemore
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-11-2006, 02:48 PM
shpanko shpanko is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Mile High Club
Posts: 4,726
Default Re: TPTK vs obvious 2 pair (600NL).

Yeah there's nothing a TAG is calling with pf and on the flop that you beat now except maybe TJs. Even then I don't see him firing that much on the turn with bottom pair. So I think it's a fold and no we don't really have odds to draw.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-11-2006, 02:49 PM
Praetor Praetor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6,248
Default Re: TPTK vs obvious 2 pair (600NL).

easy fold
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-11-2006, 02:51 PM
tannenj tannenj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Check out my blog
Posts: 3,830
Default Re: TPTK vs obvious 2 pair (600NL).

i don't get it, how is this a close decision?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-11-2006, 03:20 PM
Hattifnatt Hattifnatt is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: FT
Posts: 8,202
Default Re: TPTK vs obvious 2 pair (600NL).

[ QUOTE ]
easy fold

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-11-2006, 03:45 PM
axioma axioma is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London, England.
Posts: 1,263
Default Re: TPTK vs obvious 2 pair (600NL).

ok.

we have 3 outs to the nut 2 pair, and a further 4 for the nut straight.

i find it hard to put him on an hand in which we would need to discount our outs, ie. he would be reraising pre with [kk, qq], and he is not over-calling flop with [jj, AT].

so as i see it we have 7 clean outs against his very likely 2 pair, plus the fact we are splitting with another (less likely) AK, plus the fact that he may be trying something goofy.

is it really such an easy fold? what if he had more behind?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-11-2006, 03:50 PM
Big_Jim Big_Jim is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: BEHIND YOU
Posts: 12,323
Default Re: TPTK vs obvious 2 pair (600NL).

[ QUOTE ]
so as i see it we have 7 clean outs against his very likely 2 pair, plus the fact we are splitting with another (less likely) AK, plus the fact that he may be trying something goofy.

[/ QUOTE ]
EDIT: Even if you stack him every time, you don't have implied odds, if you're behind, and you're almost always behind.

[ QUOTE ]
he is not over-calling flop with [jj, AT].

[/ QUOTE ]
He didn't overcall anywhere in the hand

[ QUOTE ]
is it really such an easy fold? what if he had more behind?

[/ QUOTE ]
How does having more behind help you in any way? EDIT: Your outs are all scare cards, and you're OOP, I just don't see a way to get paid enough when you improve.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-11-2006, 04:20 PM
swarm swarm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 489
Default Re: TPTK vs obvious 2 pair (600NL).

Do you not know how to calculate pot odds? You best learn.

We have 7 outs at most, we could have as litte as 4 if we are behind a set. Villan bet 4/5 the pot, we are not deep enough to be making loose calls...

Even if we were deep our outs are so obvious that it wouldn't make sense to make a loose call because we aren't getting paid off and often face really bad reverse implied odds when we improve to a better 2nd best hand.

Even if he flipped his hand face up, we saw that he had QJ, we don't have immediate odds to call. In fact we would barely have implied odds if villan continued to stack off when we hit or ridiculously obvious outs. I do not put villan on QJ here either by the way. This is KQ or KJ or a set of 3's.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.