Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-02-2007, 06:51 AM
Sciolist Sciolist is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 4,135
Default Time Question

Does anyone have any links talking about what time is for a non-technical reader? I just read a discover magazine article:

http://discovermagazine.com/2007/jun/in-no-time

And I'd like to know more. I am thinking it's reasonable that time doesn't exist in the same way that we think about it, just as most things don't. I am having a lot of trouble thinking of time not being a fundamental process though, as it seems to be so pervasive for us. I remember reading some articles about reverse causality a while ago though, and need to read more things like this to help form a proper opinion on time.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-02-2007, 09:13 AM
Metric Metric is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,178
Default Re: Time Question

I wrote an intro to this here:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...4251&page=

It is a bit mathy, but hopefully gives you a taste of the difference the historically understood "time as a parameter in the Schrodinger equation" and "time in the Wheeler-DeWitt equation", which was mentioned in the article you cite.

Also -- that guy Carlo Rovelli who was referenced in that article is my hero.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-02-2007, 09:52 AM
Sciolist Sciolist is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London
Posts: 4,135
Default Re: Time Question

[ QUOTE ]
I wrote an intro to this here:

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/sh...4251&page=

It is a bit mathy, but hopefully gives you a taste of the difference the historically understood "time as a parameter in the Schrodinger equation" and "time in the Wheeler-DeWitt equation", which was mentioned in the article you cite.

Also -- that guy Carlo Rovelli who was referenced in that article is my hero.

[/ QUOTE ]
Sorry, afraid you lost me at covariant :]

How wikipedia defines it in the first paragraph and the way you use it don't seem to mesh too well for me. Perhaps it'd make more sense if I understood past the first paragraph of the wikipedia entry
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.